• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Google takes on Spyware

Amused

Elite Member
http://www.google.com/corporate/software_principles.html

At Google, we put a lot of thought into improving your online experience. We're alarmed by what we believe is a growing disregard for your rights as computer users. We've seen increasing reports of spyware and other applications that trick you in order to serve you pop-up ads, connect your modem to expensive toll numbers or hijack your browser from the site you're trying to visit.

We do not see this trend reversing itself. In fact, it is getting worse. As a provider of services and monetization for users, advertisers and publishers on the Internet, we feel a responsibility to be proactive about these issues. So, we have decided to take action. As a first step, we have outlined a set of principles we believe our industry should adopt and we're sharing them to foster discussion and help solve the problem. We intend to follow these guidelines ourselves with the applications we distribute (such as the Google Toolbar and Google Deskbar). And because we strongly believe these principles are good for the industry and users worldwide, we will encourage our current and prospective business partners to adopt them as well.

These guidelines are, by necessity, broad. Software creation and distribution are complex and the technology is continuously evolving. As a result, some useful applications may not comply entirely with these principles and some deceptive practices may not be addressed here. This document is only a start, and focuses on the areas of Internet software and advertising. These guidelines need to be continually updated to keep pace with ever-changing technology.

We look forward to an ongoing discussion with you and with our partners. We would like to hear your suggestions to improve and update these principles. Please send your comments to software-principles@google.com.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED PRINCIPLES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


INSTALLATION

We believe software should not trick you into installing it. It should be clear to you when you are installing or enabling software on your computer and you should have the ability to say no. An application shouldn't install itself onto your computer secretly or by hiding within another program you're installing or updating. You should be conspicuously notified of the functions of all the applications in a bundle.

UPFRONT DISCLOSURE

When an application is installed or enabled, it should inform you of its principal and significant functions. And if the application makes money by showing you advertising, it should clearly and conspicuously explain this. This information should be presented in a way that a typical user will see and understand -- not buried in small print that requires you to scroll. For example, if the application is paid for by serving pop-up ads or sending your personal data to a third party, that should be made clear to you.

SIMPLE REMOVAL

It should be easy for you to figure out how to disable or delete an application. The process should try to remove sufficient components to disable all functions of the application, visible or not, without messing up your computer. Once an application is disabled or deleted, it should not remain active or be automatically enabled later by itself or another application.

CLEAR BEHAVIOR

Applications that affect or change your user experience should make clear they are the reason for those changes. For example, if an application opens a window, that window should identify the application responsible for it. Applications should not intentionally obscure themselves under multiple or confusing names. You should be given means to control the application in a straightforward manner, such as by clicking on visible elements generated by the application. If an application shows you ads, it should clearly mark them as advertising and inform you that they originate from that application. If an application makes a change designed to affect the user experience of other applications (such as setting your home page) then those changes should be made clear to you.

SNOOPING

If an application collects or transmits your personal information such as your address, you should know. We believe you should be asked explicitly for your permission in a manner that is obvious and clearly states what information will be collected or transmitted. For more detail, it should be easy to find a privacy policy that discloses how the information will be used and whether it will be shared with third parties.

KEEPING GOOD COMPANY

Application providers should not allow their products to be bundled with applications that do not meet these guidelines.

Many internet users find that over time their computers become loaded with unwanted software - be it adware, spyware or just plain junk. This is because a few applications they installed came bundled with junk, and that junk generated more junk piled higher and deeper. We believe any situation where multiple applications are being installed should be made very clear to users, so that if you were to ask them several months later - "What's this?" - most will know where it came from and why it is there.

Usually there are complex business relationships among the companies participating in a bundle. This can result in well-intentioned companies benefiting from the distribution or revenue generated by software that does not benefit you. Getting paid to distribute, or paying money to be distributed with undesirable software enables more undesirable software. Responsible software makers and advertisers can work to prevent such distribution by avoiding these types of business relationships, even if they are through intermediaries.

We are alarmed by the size of this problem, which we estimate to be causing hundreds of millions of dollars to be changing hands annually. Because of this magnitude and user impact, strong action by the industry is imperative.

We believe that it is in our users' and the industry's interest to work to eliminate this problem. For this reason, we will strive to distribute our software only in bundles where all applications meet the above guidelines, and we think users will benefit if others in our industry do the same.

Note: If you think you have a deceptive application on your computer, or just want to check to be certain, there are a number of programs that can help you. Spybot Search and Destroy, LavaSoft's AdAware, and CWShredder are commonly used. These programs can remove the most common malicious applications, though our users report that you may need to try more than one and having the latest versions is important.
 
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
I thought google itself was a form of spyware... (at least gmail)

The difference is, no Google programs try to install themselves without permission or automatically. Also, google is upfront with what they do, and in the case of the Google Toolbar, they allow you to opt out of any spyware activity. Furthermore, all Google programs are easily removed.
 
It's an admirable sentiment, but I'm unsure as to how they think these principles are going to be enforced. Spyware writers aren't likely to heed these guidelines, just find a way to ignore them.
 
Very good to hear but whether it'll have any effect is debatable. Still, the more companies following this trend the better
 
Nice to see Google taking a stand on this, but I doubt it's going to make much of a difference. Now, if they came out with their own anti-spyware program a la SpyBot, that would be cool. :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
:heart: google

The unscrupulous pieces of crap that write this stuff have no sense of decency to begin with so it's highly doubtful they will willingly comply with these standards.

I take my hat off to Google, however, for recognizing this growing trend and taking a stand of some sort.
 
*shrug* it's not that i don't care, it just doesn't surprise me that google would do something like this.
 
I bet if Google suddenly removed web pages with didnt follow its guidelines from its search queries people would be a whole lot more supportive in meeting their guidelines.
 
Back
Top