• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Question Google Finds a Bug in Intel CPUs

nicalandia

Diamond Member
Google Uncovers CPU Bug For Geminilake

I can't wait for those class action Lawsuits for the 40% performance decrease with Intel CPU, now buggy CPUs?
 
Google Uncovers CPU Bug For Geminilake

I can't wait for those class action Lawsuits for the 40% performance decrease with Intel CPU, now buggy CPUs?
Seriously?? Where did you get that 40% number?? And apparently there are already workarounds and it has been fixed in Firefox. Seems like a minor, hard to reproduce issue in a low end processer which is not even used that widely.
 
Are you waiting for the class action lawsuits for the AMD bug?


Probably not, because you seem to be an AMD shill and only post negative responses about Intel.

Calling a member a shill is not allowed.
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously?? Where did you get that 40% number?? And apparently there are already workarounds and it has been fixed in Firefox. Seems like a minor, hard to reproduce issue in a low end processer which is not even used that widely.

Nice, I actually agree with you. At least about the 40% part. Don't just make up numbers. This is how you should make an argument, instead of just crapping on AMD when you feel like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IEC
Are you waiting for the class action lawsuits for the AMD bug?

Not that this isn't probably being way overblown but there is a huge difference between this and bugs like a boosting algorithm issue in the bios (easily fixable) or a bug that limits clock speed (in essence manufacturing issue that limits their retail spec performance) neither of those are really actionable because one is easy to fix and the other is their problem not ours.

Not properly handling code is pretty big. Though still possibly fixable with a microcode update. Not like back in the day where it basically forced a full on recall.
 
Seriously?? Where did you get that 40% number?
From Apple?


Sorry if I was not clear enough, posting a thread requires that I leave a comment, I was trying to say that with Intel Recent Security Issues and now this Bug?
 
And apparently there are already workarounds and it has been fixed in Firefox. Seems like a minor, hard to reproduce issue in a low end processer which is not even used that widely.

Firefox had to fix something that never should have required a fix in the first place. See comment by @dmens .

Also, Gemini Lake is used pretty widely. It's present in numerous office/low-end PCs and some notebooks. Intel will be refreshing Gemini Lake as well (instead of introducing a consumer-level Atom based on Tremont, which will come later). One wonders if the same bug will be present in Gemini Lake R.

Are you waiting for the class action lawsuits for the AMD bug?

You joke, but AMD has been sued for less. At least the "boost bug" has been fixed, and caused exactly nobody's system to crash.
 
Interesting. I doubt the bug would affect them much though.
Maybe not the purpose-built firmware, they can implement the workarounds in the base firmware image, but these NAS units have the ability to download and run "apps" on them, from 3rd-parties, and whatnot, that's what I'm concerned more about.
 
Back
Top