Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Argue with the economist.
Is that
The Economist or the economist that picked 400K? I love
The Economist but even good media occasionally prints dribble.
I forgot who dared question me but let me save you some minutes on Friends and Family plan:
Title of thread . . .
Great news today on the economy
Created On 10/09/2003 6:01 PM by Sternfan
Comment #1 . . . I never see much
positive news here so I thought I would start posting some. I know some on this site will hate to hear something
good but I say TO BAD!
Comment #2 . . . What it means is things are getting better what part of that don't you understand? Are you telling me even during the hay days of Clinton new job claims were zero.
Some good news lately and yet you can't see it. Just like I said some on this forum will hate it and I was 100% right.
Charrison joins the fray . . . Numbers less than 400k indicate the employment market is expanding.
This is good news...
Pertinent retort to criticism . . . Sorry you don't get it, have a nice life.
why don't you go read the foreskin thread, maybe bali can't explain that to you.
Admittedly, the original article did NOT use the term good . . . it does indeed reference a growing economy and various indicators that are improving. Accordingly, why don't you switch your thread title to reflect the actual content of the article?