- Apr 22, 2001
- 1,777
- 18
- 81
Originally posted by: ja1484
How'sat good news? It's just going to keep them from moving out of the dinosaur age that much longer. AGP started dying in early '04 and has been officially dead since early '05 people. Get with the program.
Originally posted by: Cogman
Sure, hopefully this will help kill AGP faster. I don't understand why people stick with it when they are spending $20, $30, sometimes $50 premium just so their card will work with there old system. Yeah, it sucks to have to upgrade your entire system, but you can get an entry level PCIE system for dirt now a days.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
AGP started "dying", but as you can see, it's not dead. This is perfect for people who want to upgrade their graphics card, but do not have enough money for an entirely new platform. If Powercolor keeps this reasonably priced, around 200 bucks, then it is a terrific way to breathe new life into your aging AGP system.
Originally posted by: Cogman
Sure, hopefully this will help kill AGP faster. I don't understand why people stick with it when they are spending $20, $30, sometimes $50 premium just so their card will work with there old system. Yeah, it sucks to have to upgrade your entire system, but you can get an entry level PCIE system for dirt now a days.
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
AGP started "dying", but as you can see, it's not dead. This is perfect for people who want to upgrade their graphics card, but do not have enough money for an entirely new platform. If Powercolor keeps this reasonably priced, around 200 bucks, then it is a terrific way to breathe new life into your aging AGP system.
Nah, it's dead. There's just people in denial.
I don't have the cash to redo my system very often either - the platform you see in my sig was originally constructed in Jan 2004 around an OC'd A64 3000+ Winchester with 1GB DDR400 and a 6600GT. I specifically waited until early 2004 so that I could get in on the PCIe motherboard with (then top notch) socket 939 and have a platform that would carry me through upgrades until done with graduate school, which at that time I was *starting* a year after the PC was built. It's aging now, but still has enough juice to get it done with anything on the market (thanks in no small part to the 8800), and should for the next year until I'm getting some actual job money in the bank rather than living like a pauper to minimize my debt.
Well, here we are 4 years later. In that span I added a second GB of memory, swapped out to a dual core proc, and updated the graphics card as needed. I knew back then that picking up AGP was a bad idea - hell the whole community knew it. It's called planning. AGP has been a bad idea for about 5 years now, and if you're still using 5 year old graphics hardware, you aren't playing today's games, period, and you'll never need PCIe.
The sooner they stop making AGP variants, the better. It'll cut down on the clutter in the already overcrowded graphics card retail space.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
My friend, deny the fact that there are new AGP cards being made as we speak. As long as they are being made, they're alive and kicking. If there were no market for AGP, they wouldn't be making them. THEN it would be dead. Deny that. Now you tell me, who is really in denial here?
Hey, you're entitled to your opinion as we all are. But anyone can see, there is still a market for AGP. I have 2 PCI-e systems, and 3 AGP systems that are pretty decent. All above 3GHz for the AGP systems. Technically, my household is still 60% AGP. ATI has the potential to sell me 3 of these 3850's. Will I? Probably not, in fact I only see one in my future. And one for my mothers computer. So in just my immediate family alone, we will buy two of these AGP 3850's. Now, think about the millions of PC users who still have AGP systems. I don't have census data to tell me the ratio, but I'd be willing to bet there are still more AGP systems out there than there are PCI-e. Eventually that will change of course, just as AGP replaced PCI.
Keep an open mind. You'll go further in.... well, whatever it is you do.
Originally posted by: spittledip
why do people care if AGP dies or not? You all need to just keep it quiet if you don't like it.
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
My friend, deny the fact that there are new AGP cards being made as we speak. As long as they are being made, they're alive and kicking. If there were no market for AGP, they wouldn't be making them. THEN it would be dead. Deny that. Now you tell me, who is really in denial here?
You're missing the point, and thus arguing the wrong point.
The point is not that there's a market for AGP cards. There's a market for ballerina costumes that you can put on your dog for halloween.
The point is that people buying both should know better.
Hey, you're entitled to your opinion as we all are. But anyone can see, there is still a market for AGP. I have 2 PCI-e systems, and 3 AGP systems that are pretty decent. All above 3GHz for the AGP systems. Technically, my household is still 60% AGP. ATI has the potential to sell me 3 of these 3850's. Will I? Probably not, in fact I only see one in my future. And one for my mothers computer. So in just my immediate family alone, we will buy two of these AGP 3850's. Now, think about the millions of PC users who still have AGP systems. I don't have census data to tell me the ratio, but I'd be willing to bet there are still more AGP systems out there than there are PCI-e. Eventually that will change of course, just as AGP replaced PCI.
Keep an open mind. You'll go further in.... well, whatever it is you do.
Of course there are probably more AGP systems than PCI-e. And it's holding back the rest of us, which is why we need to force these geriatrics to get a move on.
And this has nothing to do with open minds, for goodness sakes. I'm aware of all the things you point out. You're off topic again. I'll boil it down to an even more basic level: Screw AGP. It's not what I want.
Originally posted by: spittledip
why do people care if AGP dies or not? You all need to just keep it quiet if you don't like it.
It's a win-win. While it's hanging around by its fingernails, we get to be elitists and make fun of people still using it, and when it's finally kicked the bucket good and dead we can move on with advancing the tech again. Thus, the whole glorious cycle repeats.
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
What's wrong with people having a s939 mobo, a opteron 180 or whatever dualcore CPU, oc-ed past 2.5ghz, wanting some decent GPU horsepower to tide them over for a little while longer ? I could easily see ppl use such a rig for rts/rpg like games, and it will even play plenty of shooters too. When they go for penryn or phenom they could pass that rig down, and it could still play plenty of games, and be used by kids, or used for playing against friends.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
What's wrong with people having a s939 mobo, a opteron 180 or whatever dualcore CPU, oc-ed past 2.5ghz, wanting some decent GPU horsepower to tide them over for a little while longer ? I could easily see ppl use such a rig for rts/rpg like games, and it will even play plenty of shooters too. When they go for penryn or phenom they could pass that rig down, and it could still play plenty of games, and be used by kids, or used for playing against friends.
Absolutely nothing. Let me get a show of digital hands here. How many of you think that in the following system, a 3850AGP would offer, if not optimum, a decent improvement?
P4 2.8
1GB DDR
ASUS P4P800
GeForce 6600 128MB
Originally posted by: Canterwood
And as for this holding us back crap... well, I just wish people would get rid of those old 939 cpu's so we can all move on to quad cores.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Absolutely nothing. Let me get a show of digital hands here. How many of you think that in the following system, a 3850AGP would offer, if not optimum, a decent improvement?
P4 2.8
1GB DDR
ASUS P4P800
GeForce 6600 128MB
Originally posted by: SexyK
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
What's wrong with people having a s939 mobo, a opteron 180 or whatever dualcore CPU, oc-ed past 2.5ghz, wanting some decent GPU horsepower to tide them over for a little while longer ? I could easily see ppl use such a rig for rts/rpg like games, and it will even play plenty of shooters too. When they go for penryn or phenom they could pass that rig down, and it could still play plenty of games, and be used by kids, or used for playing against friends.
Absolutely nothing. Let me get a show of digital hands here. How many of you think that in the following system, a 3850AGP would offer, if not optimum, a decent improvement?
P4 2.8
1GB DDR
ASUS P4P800
GeForce 6600 128MB
I don't really care one way or the other whether they keep making AGP cards, but that system will not even scratch the surface of leveraging the full power of a 3850, so it seems like a waste in my book. When you finally upgrade to a CPU that can use the power of the graphics card, your graphics card will be the wrong interface, so you'll have to buy a new one anyway. The card will ALWAYS be held back and never reach it's full potential, so why spend the cash on it?
Originally posted by: ja1484
Christ never mind. You lot are no fun at all.
It's holding us back because instead of still riding this PCI-e standard we could be making it obsolete and moving on. But no...gotta wait around for EVERYONE to get on the bandwagon before we can do that.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: SexyK
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: MarcVenice
What's wrong with people having a s939 mobo, a opteron 180 or whatever dualcore CPU, oc-ed past 2.5ghz, wanting some decent GPU horsepower to tide them over for a little while longer ? I could easily see ppl use such a rig for rts/rpg like games, and it will even play plenty of shooters too. When they go for penryn or phenom they could pass that rig down, and it could still play plenty of games, and be used by kids, or used for playing against friends.
Absolutely nothing. Let me get a show of digital hands here. How many of you think that in the following system, a 3850AGP would offer, if not optimum, a decent improvement?
P4 2.8
1GB DDR
ASUS P4P800
GeForce 6600 128MB
I don't really care one way or the other whether they keep making AGP cards, but that system will not even scratch the surface of leveraging the full power of a 3850, so it seems like a waste in my book. When you finally upgrade to a CPU that can use the power of the graphics card, your graphics card will be the wrong interface, so you'll have to buy a new one anyway. The card will ALWAYS be held back and never reach it's full potential, so why spend the cash on it?
Agreed. It's not optimum. But if you had to (and lets' assume you do), what would you rather spend your 200 bucks on? A 7900GS AGP or a 3850AGP?
Either way, there will be a significant improvement over a plain 6600 even though the full potential of the 3850 won't be realized. And that P4 could be o/c'd a fair bit as well. It's a good northy. Probably get it up to 3.3 without too much trouble.
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: ja1484
Christ never mind. You lot are no fun at all.
It's holding us back because instead of still riding this PCI-e standard we could be making it obsolete and moving on. But no...gotta wait around for EVERYONE to get on the bandwagon before we can do that.
how about dumping your old HW ... it isn't all that fast anymore
--you are holding the rest of us back
your arguments are pretty weak ... AGP is no more holding back PCIe - now up to PCIe2 - then current [ancient] PCI video cards are holding anything back ... they are just catering to a market that won't upgrade *everything* yet. Yet they still want at least mid-range gaming performance without a lot of "work" and expense.
btw, PCIe is old news ... better upgrade again to 2 ... or else it's holding back progress to PCIe3
:roll: