Good news for Buffalo

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Originally posted by: Slashdot
The Circuit court did no such thing - it ruled that the judge had erred in issuing a summary judgment, and it needed to go back to trial. NOWHERE in the link does it say that the Appellate Court ruled on the validity of the patent.
 

JackMDS

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 25, 1999
29,556
431
126
Buffalo actually stated that this does not change the status of availability.

Quote from, http://www.buffalotech.com/products/wireless/

"Buffalo is confident that the final decision will be favorable and that the injunction will be lifted. However, at the present time, Buffalo is unable to supply wireless LAN equipment compliant with IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g standards in the United States".
 

xSauronx

Lifer
Jul 14, 2000
19,582
4
81
Originally posted by: JackMDS
Buffalo actually stated that this does not change the status of availability.

Quote from, http://www.buffalotech.com/products/wireless/

"Buffalo is confident that the final decision will be favorable and that the injunction will be lifted. However, at the present time, Buffalo is unable to supply wireless LAN equipment compliant with IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g standards in the United States".

makes sense. if they havent been able to sell it here they likely dont have any inventory, and wouldnt want to get any until theyre sure theyre in the clear.

*shrug*

both my units are still working fine, so, i dont care :p