good lord this is the slowest thing ever.

[hans007]

due to my selling my desktop to get a laptop

and my celeron tualatin not working in this old board quite right even with an adapter i am using a VIA Cyrix III 600 to run windows XP.

wow.... i had never actually used one of these things, but i dont think this should count as a cpu.

 

[n0cmonkey]

I want a C3.

 

[Zugzwang152]

win 95 will run like a champ on that machine 😀😉

 

[hans007]

Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
win 95 will run like a champ on that machine 😀😉

winxp kinda runs ok. most likely because i had 256mb ram.


ive got a 13.6 GB screamer of a hard drive in there too.

 

[crisp82]

Originally posted by: hans007

Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
win 95 will run like a champ on that machine 😀😉

winxp kinda runs ok. most likely because i had 256mb ram.


ive got a 13.6 GB screamer of a hard drive in there too.

<--------Pentium 2 466mhz

4mb of screamingky fast visually intense graphics

56 whole k of internet access (just to myself I add)

256mb SDRAM

40GB HD.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
w00t!!!!

 

[dc]

er, you mean celeron 466?

 

[GtPrOjEcTX]

I never understand why people with sucky computers like to brag about them...

 

[GtPrOjEcTX]

Originally posted by: dc
er, you mean celeron 466?

Quite right as there was no P2 466...closest was the P2 450.

 

[hans007]

Originally posted by: crisp82

Originally posted by: hans007

Originally posted by: Zugzwang152
win 95 will run like a champ on that machine 😀😉

winxp kinda runs ok. most likely because i had 256mb ram.


ive got a 13.6 GB screamer of a hard drive in there too.

<--------Pentium 2 466mhz

4mb of screamingky fast visually intense graphics

56 whole k of internet access (just to myself I add)

256mb SDRAM

40GB HD.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
w00t!!!!

i actually think this might be slower than a 466 celeron. on most benchmarks its in the pentium 400 or 350 class. i think floating point is in the pentium 233 class. which is just sad.