From a 10 second Google search I found three publicized successful defensive gun uses that same day:
Clerk defends himself against armed robber
74-year-old man stops burglary
Homeowners thwart home invasion
But since I'm not a mouth-breathing idiot, I'm not going to jizz all over myself claiming that these anecdotes prove some political point.
Edit: Actually, I'll help you out, OP. Defensive gun uses are much more common than accidental shootings, and a concealed carrier accidentally shooting the victim or a bystander is extremely rare. "Good guys with guns" are overwhelmingly safe and law-abiding people--some analyses have shown that they commit fewer crimes than cops--and using a single anecdote to paint them all as incompetent yahoos just makes you look like an ignorant dumbass. If you want a productive conversation about firearms, talk about real problems like homicides and suicides, not irrelevant bullshit like this.
Kleck says they found 222 bonafide DGUs directly via survey. The defender had to "state a specific crime they thought was being committed" and to have actually used the gun, even if just threateningly or by "verbally referring to the gun." Kleck insists the surveyors were scrupulous about eliminating any sketchy or questionable-seeming responses.
I don't want a productive conversation about firearms. I'm one of the liberals that honestly doesn't want more gun control and would in fact be fine with less gun control. I'm not trying to "paint them all as incompetent yahoos." I just thought this incident was funny.From a 10 second Google search I found three publicized successful defensive gun uses that same day:
Clerk defends himself against armed robber
74-year-old man stops burglary
Homeowners thwart home invasion
But since I'm not a mouth-breathing idiot, I'm not going to jizz all over myself claiming that these anecdotes prove some political point.
Edit: Actually, I'll help you out, OP. Defensive gun uses are much more common than accidental shootings, and a concealed carrier accidentally shooting the victim or a bystander is extremely rare. "Good guys with guns" are overwhelmingly safe and law-abiding people--some analyses have shown that they commit fewer crimes than cops--and using a single anecdote to paint them all as incompetent yahoos just makes you look like an ignorant dumbass. If you want a productive conversation about firearms, talk about real problems like homicides and suicides, not irrelevant bullshit like this.
You're right about much of that. OTOH, the actual # of accidental homicides is nearly 3X that of justifiable gun homicides-
http://www.the-broad-side.com/guns-for-self-defense-myth-versus-reality
That piece is just the first hit for the numbers.
How can they be sure that shooter wasn't one of the carjackers? He sure knew enough to clean up his crime scene, which a guilty party would certainly want to do.
Count yourself lucky if you've never been in a situation where merely stating you have a gun has an instant and tangible impact on the outcome of that situation.
I don't want a productive conversation about firearms. I'm one of the liberals that honestly doesn't want more gun control and would in fact be fine with less gun control. I'm not trying to "paint them all as incompetent yahoos." I just thought this incident was funny.