Gonzales won't step down from Abramoff probe

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
I am curious where Alberto learned to interpret laws and determine what does and doesn't constitute a conflict of interest.....if at all. I think that someone should inform Alberto that there really isn't that much concern about the career attorneys being the partisans that are "motivated by a political agenda" influencing the outcome of the prosecution.

CNN Link

Democrats want Gonzales off Abramoff inquiry

Thursday, February 16, 2006; Posted: 1:37 p.m. EST (18:37 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Thirty-one Senate Democrats on Thursday asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to remove himself from the investigation into the Jack Abramoff scandal, saying the lobbyist's dealings with President Bush and others in the administration should compel Gonzales to step aside.

"FBI officials have said the Abramoff investigation 'involves systemic corruption within the highest levels of government,'" the Democrats wrote in a letter to Gonzales. "In light of your previous service as White House Counsel and your close connection to many Administration officials, the appearance of conflict looms large."

The attorney general "can avoid any appearance of impropriety by recusing himself," said Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, one of the signers of the letter. "If there was ever a case that was both sensitive and rife with potential conflict -- it is this one."

In response, Gonzales said that "we've got career prosecutors involved in this investigation as we do in all investigations; these are folks that are not motivated by any political agenda." The attorney general made the comment on Fox News Radio. Justice Department spokeswoman Tasia Scolinos said Gonzales has followed all department guidelines and there is "no reason for him to recuse himself from the investigation at this time."


Lobbying invoices sent by Abramoff's firm to one client, the Northern Mariana Islands, show at least 200 contacts between Abramoff's lobbying team and the Bush administration in Bush's first 10 months in office.

Abramoff raised at least $100,000 for Bush's 2004 re-election campaign to become a "pioneer," one of the honorary titles that Bush gave his top volunteer fundraisers. Benefits of pioneer status included invitations to White House Christmas parties and other gatherings featuring the president.

New questions have arisen about Abramoff's ties to the White House since a photo emerged over the weekend showing Abramoff with Bush. The White House would not release the photo or any others that Bush had taken with Abramoff.

Bush has said that he, like all presidents, is frequently photographed with people at various events and that Abramoff is not a personal friend.

Also surfacing were the contents of an e-mail from Abramoff to Washingtonian magazine claiming he had met briefly with the president nearly a dozen times and that Bush knew him well enough to make joking references to Abramoff's family.

Three former associates of Abramoff told The Associated Press this week that the lobbyist frequently told them he had strong ties to the White House through presidential confidant Karl Rove.

David H. Safavian, Bush's former top procurement officer, is under indictment on five counts of obstructing investigations into whether he aided Abramoff in efforts to acquire property around the nation's capital controlled by the General Services Administration.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
How are you going to whitewash it if you pull out all your best people?! Duhhh!!!








:)
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
308
126
Its safe to say with a non-Republican president and non-GOP controlled Senate, the current heads at all levels of the government would be in some serious s***.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Its clear now that the Repub strategy is to stall prosecution until after the 11/06 elections. Libby trial isn't until 07, they had Abramoff in the barn in mid-December/05---and ain't done a damn thing for two months.---plus the justice homcho in charge
is up for a judgeship which could delay things for months more.

Yet we trust Gonzales, a man who can't read the clear language of the constitution, to be unbiased and not be required to recuse himself???????? Were checks from Abramoff what our founding fathers were thinking of when they referred to checks and balances?-----and that our Prez didn't hardly know the guy. Coulda been any old John P. Public and that our photogenic president is photographed so frequently with all Americans?

By golly, I just think they just might get away with it.

Justice delayed is justice denied----except if you wait until after the election where you get to give the voter two more years of the same.