i´m running sli 770s and it´s been a great upgrade, if you can still get a 670 for a good price, i say go for it.
read reviews about gtx 690, that is the performance you can expect, lots of benchmarks of gtx 690 @ 1440p out there.
i´m running either 6000x1080 (3x fullhd + bezel compensation)
or 3200x1350 (downsampling resolution of 21:9 monitor; 1.25x1.25--> about same resolution as 1440p, actually its more, 4.32Mpixel vs 3.6864Mpixel= 1.17:1)
both resolutions running really good, most games at either ultra settings or high + 4xAA with 60fps vsync, older/less demanding ones ultra+AA
little less for the triple monitor setup, depending on game
sli670 should be like 10-15% slower, i suppose
psu should be fine, i got 720Wpsu with more power hungry cards
good with 1254MHz overclock on both cards valley benchmark, no cpu overclock (xeon)
depending on cpu, as you have lga1155 board, that shouldn´t be too power hungry either
then again, your mobo doesn´t seem to support sli (i checked on the gigabyte homepage), but it does crossfire, maybe you should wait for a decent cooled r290
that alone should be pretty good for a 1440p monitor when run at say a conservative 1100MHz overclock, which should be no problem for the custom cooled cards that are about to come
getting a second of those should even be good for 4k, psu will be close shave
if you want to keep mainboard and psu and the best performance possible for that scenario, go for single 780ti or r9 290x, numbers will be lower than cf r9 290 but framtimes will be smoother and the performance will almost equal the 670 sli
but single card is always preferable, if similar fps (frametimes, inputlag, driver issues)
also, for my part, i love having uncut, full gpus without clusters being deactivated, even though it is stupid from a bang for buck point of view
i thought all the full grown gk110 would go into 3k+$ quadros and teslas, but here they are
