Going from a 85% to a 90% effecient PSU worth it?

videobruce

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2001
1,072
11
81
How much actual wattage drop with a given PC going from a 85% efficient PS (rated at 600w for example) to a 90% efficient supply? IOW's when measuring the AC current at the wall, using a 600w rated supply as the example, how much less wattage could I expect? 5, 10, 15 watts?

Is the extra $$ worth it?
 
Last edited:

jacktesterson

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
5,493
3
81
No - 80+ Bronze is the sweet point. I don't feel going higher is worth the premium unless you get it on sale.

Doesn't always work the same as above. My ZT 550w can do all 550w on the 12v rail (45a) yet is 80+ Bronze.
 

lehtv

Elite Member
Dec 8, 2010
11,897
74
91
600w @ 90% = 540w
600w @ 85% = 510w

Having a 600W unit doesn't mean you actually use 600W. So those numbers mean nothing unless you're stressing the power supply to its full capacity for long periods of time - which you should never do, really.

@ OP

For the average user it's not worth it with respect to the cost of electricity, unless you pay only marginally more for the higher efficiency unit. With a cost of electricity of 10c per kWh and a usage of 5h/day at an average of 200W (from the wall), you'd use 10c worth of power each day or $36.50 per year. Upgrading from a 85% efficient unit to 90% efficient one would save only $2 per year. If you assume the high efficiency unit is only $20 more expensive than what you'd get from selling the old unit - which is probably not going to happen - it would take a decade for that upgrade to pay itself back.

In special scenarios the higher efficiency becomes more viable. E.g. you want a unit that is silent even with your system at full load. Or you have much higher than average system load per day, e.g. 8h of video editing per day and rendering at night. Or your area has abnormally high cost of electricity.
 
Last edited:

Nec_V20

Senior member
May 7, 2013
404
0
0
The wattage rating of the PSU is the maximum that it is rated to supply reliably.

The percentage relates to the amount of AC current the PSU has to draw in order to produce the DC output. This value translates directly to your wallet.

At 600 Watts output an 85% efficient PSU would have to draw 706 Watts from the wall. For a 90% efficient PSU it would have to draw 667 Watts.

The 90% PSU will be just over 5.5% cheaper to run than an 85% efficient PSU.

If you have your computer on 24/7 that will make a lot of difference in the price of running your PC and you would have to work out for yourself whether or not the higher price of the 90% efficient PSU will amortise itself for you in a reasonable time with regard to a cheaper 85% efficient one
 

videobruce

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2001
1,072
11
81
I clarified my OP. I was basing my question on a 600w rated supply, not a device that draws 600 watts at the outlet.
Say a PC draws 100 watts on average from the wall with a old 80 plus supply from before there were these ratings, what drop in current would moving up to a 85% or 90% efficient supply provide?

I wasn't just interested in the cost of electricity. ;)
 
Last edited:

videobruce

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2001
1,072
11
81
At 600 Watts output an 85% efficient PSU would have to draw 706 Watts from the wall. For a 90% efficient PSU it would have to draw 667 Watts.
But, a 600 watt PC PSU does not draw 600 watts at 120 VAC.
 

Nec_V20

Senior member
May 7, 2013
404
0
0

We have 230 Volts AC where I live, so that makes the same PSU about 1% more efficient than using it with 120 Volts AC.

Of course the other thing to remember is that the more efficient the PSU is the less heat it produces, so this could also translate to the longevity of the PSU.

The thing is to shop around. For instance I got two Corsair AX860's each was cheaper than I would have had to pay for either an AX750, AX760, AX760i or an AX850. Each one only cost slightly more than an HX850 (pennies of difference, not pounds).

I had actually had my eye on the Corsair TX750 originally and came across the offer of the AX860 by accident. Of course when I saw the difference in price was tolerable I decided to go for the AX860.
 
Last edited: