IGemini
Platinum Member
- Nov 5, 2010
- 2,473
- 2
- 81
I'm not sure why representative policies being dictated by their religion is a new concept to you, but by your definition, "being a religious nutcase" that gets elected isn't showing favoritism on the part of the government. Merely whatever the electorate (i.e. people) gravitated to the most from the choices. And they go with the platform because it's, as you say it, "what is best" in their view. That's the nature of this representative democracy.
You seem confused as to what "separation of church and state" actually entails. Why the hell do you think people are still debating abortion, gay marriage, or genetic policy? Belief conflict. I don't think politicians are right to tell the American public when they can't do something just because of a conflict of belief, but that's what the process needs to sort out.
You seem confused as to what "separation of church and state" actually entails. Why the hell do you think people are still debating abortion, gay marriage, or genetic policy? Belief conflict. I don't think politicians are right to tell the American public when they can't do something just because of a conflict of belief, but that's what the process needs to sort out.