Scootin159
Diamond Member
- Apr 17, 2001
- 3,650
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I wonder what Mr. Lingenfelter will be doing with that GM engine when it's out.
I'm guessing about 1000hp.
Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I wonder what Mr. Lingenfelter will be doing with that GM engine when it's out.
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Big engine = big weight.Originally posted by: Cyberian
I missed where it mentioned the weight of this new engine. Could someone point it out to me?Originally posted by: Jellomancer
How do you propose it be shoehorned in a Corvette? Not to mention the massive front weight bias it would cause. I would rather have a forced induction V8.Originally posted by: vetteguy
<---Crosses his fingers, hoping this sees the insides of the next generation 'Vette.
High rpm = high cost. No one will pay as much for a GM engine as a BMW engine.Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
GM said the V-12 would produce significantly more than 500 hp but would not be more specific
That motor is a) expensive
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
that's a joke, right?That motor is a) expensive and b) meant for racing
![]()
Gee, ya think its gonna be new? I should hope so! The fact that GM has to state this engine isn't based on a 70-year-old design proves that they're known for producing outdated crap.Cadillac was the last GM division to offer a V-12, back in the 1930s. The coming V-12 is a new design, GM said.
Yeah, all that gold plating on the engine is dirt cheap...Originally posted by: yakko
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
that's a joke, right?That motor is a) expensive and b) meant for racing
![]()
The motor is not as exspensive as you would think. The exhaust cost more than the engine. Also the F1 was designed as a road car first it just happens to be of a high enough quality to race with.
Originally posted by: uncJIGGA
Yeah, all that gold plating on the engine is dirt cheap...Originally posted by: yakko
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
that's a joke, right?That motor is a) expensive and b) meant for racing
![]()
The motor is not as exspensive as you would think. The exhaust cost more than the engine. Also the F1 was designed as a road car first it just happens to be of a high enough quality to race with.
Originally posted by: yakko
Originally posted by: uncJIGGA
Yeah, all that gold plating on the engine is dirt cheap...Originally posted by: yakko
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: yakko
Why so little power? The BMW 6.1 liter V12 in the McLaren F1 puts out 627 hp.
that's a joke, right?That motor is a) expensive and b) meant for racing
![]()
The motor is not as exspensive as you would think. The exhaust cost more than the engine. Also the F1 was designed as a road car first it just happens to be of a high enough quality to race with.
The engine is not gold plated it is the engine compartment that is gold plated because it is a carbon fiber car not steel or aluminum.
I am more excited about engines like the Honda hybrid that pumps 400HP with 2 little 100HP electric motors besides the gasoline one.
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I have 2 words for GM:
Panel Gaps
and 2 more
Plastic Interior
and 2 more
Ugly Cars
Originally posted by: Cfour
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I have 2 words for GM:
Panel Gaps
and 2 more
Plastic Interior
and 2 more
Ugly Cars
and i've got two words for you!...
ignorant fool
-Tony :disgust:
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Cfour
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I have 2 words for GM:
Panel Gaps
and 2 more
Plastic Interior
and 2 more
Ugly Cars
and i've got two words for you!...
ignorant fool
-Tony :disgust:
Well, panel gaps/poor fitting exterior panels/poor fitting exterior trim and cheap interiors are what GM is known for. As for ugly cars? Aztek, Avalanche, Sunfire, Grand Am, Impala, Monte Carlo, CTS, Cavalier...all pretty rank IMHO.
If honda released a turd and called it a car I think that you would like the looks of it.. having said that, at least most of the people on this board are open-minded.
Originally posted by: NFS4
If honda released a turd and called it a car I think that you would like the looks of it.. having said that, at least most of the people on this board are open-minded.
Have you seen me post on the Honda Element? It looks like sh!t. It's rather hard to call most Honda's ugly b/c they go for the lowest common denominator in styling so they are not polarizing in styling like the CTS or Aztek. They run a line straight down the middle that is hardly offensive.
And all of those cars (with exception of the Avalanche) I mentioned are outsold by their Japanese counterparts.
Well thats interesting, considering my body man has always told me how well GM OEM parts fit onto the bodies. Strange indeed. Aztec = ugly, I'll give you that. But geez all of those other cars sell so many that they must be ugly too, right? I totally forgot for a second that what NSF4 thinks is ugly, is indeed ugly! /end sarcasm
If honda released a turd and called it a car I think that you would like the looks of it.. having said that, at least most of the people on this board are open-minded.
Tony
Originally posted by: LikeLinus01
Well thats interesting, considering my body man has always told me how well GM OEM parts fit onto the bodies. Strange indeed. Aztec = ugly, I'll give you that. But geez all of those other cars sell so many that they must be ugly too, right? I totally forgot for a second that what NSF4 thinks is ugly, is indeed ugly! /end sarcasm
If honda released a turd and called it a car I think that you would like the looks of it.. having said that, at least most of the people on this board are open-minded.
Tony
Your body man has an easy time fiting parts because of the huge gaps left over
Also, Britney Spears and Backstreet boys sell a lot of music. Does that automatically mean it's good?
Sorry but GM has the WORST design team. Half their cars are ugly, the other half outdated.
What i've always found funny is that the 2003 1500/Sierra have the exact same square dashboard that GM has been using since the 80's!!!! That just kills me and i won't purchase a Chevy truck just for that funky a$$ interior (that and the seats feel/look cheap too).
The interior is the same on all their cars. Yuck
