Global warming or not. Something is happening where I live.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Originally posted by: rpanic
I see a lot more dead trees in the mountians when I hike. :(
After pine beetles get ahold of areas and humans don't let the area burn what do you think is going to happen. It's not due to global warming thats for sure.
 

BigJelly

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: techs
When I moved to beautiful Vermont 12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.
Over the last 12 years the color seems have been pushed back almost 2 weeks. Now I understand that its not scientific, but it sure seems like there has been a major change.

No need for further research, techs has single handedly proved man-made gloabal warming. All the research is in due to techs study.

You've proven GW by your one-data point study. What great use of the scientific method.

We all know how predictible weather is, thats why your're local 7 day forecast is always dead on. So naturally October 12th's weather was the same for the last millions of years; until man invented the combustion engine.

[southpark] Make love to me techs [/southpark]
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
In the Midwest where I live in Illinois we use to get 80-100% Humidity in the summer. This summer it has been so dry that almost nothing could grow without constantly watering it. The last few years it has gotten progressively drier. The climate has changed at least for the shortfall. That may or may not indicate global warming. It seems like if all the Ice was melting that there would be more rainfall, not less.

This statement is just a statement of fact and has nothing to do with a political agenda.

On a side note. There have been 2 Ice Ages in the past. The last being 75,000 years ago. So one thing I do know is the climate is not constant. There was this little event called the dustbowl a while back.
 

rpanic

Golden Member
Dec 1, 2006
1,896
7
81
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
Originally posted by: rpanic
I see a lot more dead trees in the mountians when I hike. :(
After pine beetles get ahold of areas and humans don't let the area burn what do you think is going to happen. It's not due to global warming thats for sure.

I know that bark beetles are a big part of the dead tree problem, especially since they don?t let the forest go through its natural cycle with fires since there are houses that might get burned to now. I think a lot of the trees I see might be dead from pollution, if not climate, either way the problem is still man made.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: eits
anyone else find it funny how the pro-bush, anti-iran, pro-war, anti-peace, "insurgents = terrorists" crowd is also against the notion that humans are contributing to global warming? it's honestly like there's NOTHING they can agree on. it's just so predictable what they will end up posting. it's always the same people.

i can understand disagreeing with things that have to do with national security and war, etc. etc., but wtf? how are you people going to ALSO argue about global warming? deforestation? overpopulation? record fossil fuel consumption? you really can't see any correlation? really?? even the scientific evidence... you really disagree with that stuff, too? is it because you don't understand how to read graphical data?

Considering the cycle of warming and cooling has happened many many many times in the past. The skepticism is warranted. Imagine if something happened 1000 times in a pretty regular cycle. You add in a 3rd stimulant and it happens again. Do you believe the 3rd stimulant is to blame?

Global warming is happening, nobody can deny that. Having faith this time around out of the thousands of other warming cycles is strictly man made is something hard to believe. I am sure we have a direct input however I seriously question if it is anywhere as big as the doom and gloom crowd make it out to be. Now it has gone from fringe science to religion which makes it nearly impossible to actually discuss things. Because anybody who doesnt subscribe to the faith is a blasphemer who needs to be shouted down and shut up to make way for the religions leaders work.

Luckily scientists are always trying to prove something and thus we will over the next century refine our techniques and detwemine how much we as a species are contributing. If it is a lot then we can work on curtailing emissions. If it is nearly nothing continue doing what we do.

 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Climate != weather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate
Climate (from Ancient Greek klima) is commonly defined as the weather averaged over a long period of time. The standard averaging period is 30 years but other periods may be used depending on the purpose. Climate also includes statistics other than the average, such as the magnitudes of day-to-day or year-to-year variations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) glossary definition is:

Yes, thank you. Underlined for emphasis.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: piasabird
In the Midwest where I live in Illinois we use to get 80-100% Humidity in the summer. This summer it has been so dry that almost nothing could grow without constantly watering it. The last few years it has gotten progressively drier. The climate has changed at least for the shortfall. That may or may not indicate global warming. It seems like if all the Ice was melting that there would be more rainfall, not less.

This statement is just a statement of fact and has nothing to do with a political agenda.

On a side note. There have been 2 Ice Ages in the past. The last being 75,000 years ago. So one thing I do know is the climate is not constant.

There was this little event called the dustbowl a while back.

There is a new "Dust Bowl" in process right now.

Atlanta Metro area fed by Lake Lanier & Lake Alatoona are just about dried up:

10-15-2007 Lanier down another half-foot; talk of water rationing increases

The level of Lake Lanier dropped almost another half-foot over the weekend.

The level this morning is 1057.44, down .44 foot from Friday morning.

Meanwhile, the Corps of Engineers plans to increase the flow of water out of the lake. The Corps says downstream reservoirs are nearly depleted and need additional water for a power plant and federally protected freshwater mussels. On Friday, Governor Perdue threatened to sue the Corps unless it slows the release of water from Lanier and other Georgia reservoirs.

WATER RATIONING?

As reported earlier, in about two weeks, state Environmental Protection Division Director Carol Couch is expected to send Gov. Sonny Perdue options to tighten water restrictions.

The Atlanta-Journal Constitution reports Couch has authority to limit water use as necessary with as little as five days' notice.

The paper quotes state law as saying "In the event of a dire emergency, only water for domestic and personal uses, for drinking, cooking, washing, sanitary purposes and all health related activities will be permitted. Farm uses will be given second priority; however, all other usages will be established by the Director."


 

dyna

Senior member
Oct 20, 2006
813
61
91
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: piasabird
In the Midwest where I live in Illinois we use to get 80-100% Humidity in the summer. This summer it has been so dry that almost nothing could grow without constantly watering it. The last few years it has gotten progressively drier. The climate has changed at least for the shortfall. That may or may not indicate global warming. It seems like if all the Ice was melting that there would be more rainfall, not less.

This statement is just a statement of fact and has nothing to do with a political agenda.

On a side note. There have been 2 Ice Ages in the past. The last being 75,000 years ago. So one thing I do know is the climate is not constant.

There was this little event called the dustbowl a while back.

There is a new "Dust Bowl" in process right now.

Atlanta Metro area fed by Lake Lanier & Lake Alatoona are just about dried up:

10-15-2007 Lanier down another half-foot; talk of water rationing increases

The level of Lake Lanier dropped almost another half-foot over the weekend.

The level this morning is 1057.44, down .44 foot from Friday morning.

Meanwhile, the Corps of Engineers plans to increase the flow of water out of the lake. The Corps says downstream reservoirs are nearly depleted and need additional water for a power plant and federally protected freshwater mussels. On Friday, Governor Perdue threatened to sue the Corps unless it slows the release of water from Lanier and other Georgia reservoirs.

WATER RATIONING?

As reported earlier, in about two weeks, state Environmental Protection Division Director Carol Couch is expected to send Gov. Sonny Perdue options to tighten water restrictions.

The Atlanta-Journal Constitution reports Couch has authority to limit water use as necessary with as little as five days' notice.

The paper quotes state law as saying "In the event of a dire emergency, only water for domestic and personal uses, for drinking, cooking, washing, sanitary purposes and all health related activities will be permitted. Farm uses will be given second priority; however, all other usages will be established by the Director."


This isn't unusual, imho. Same thing happen at Lake Travis, near Austin, TX. But there was record rainfall this year and it went from 40 ft low to 20 ft high.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: dyna
This isn't unusual, imho. Same thing happen at Lake Travis, near Austin, TX. But there was record rainfall this year and it went from 40 ft low to 20 ft high.

The difference is the Army Corp is letting more water out of Lanier than coming in.

Interesting situation.

It's 100% Political with real lives on the line.

I'm sure there is a Republican Vs Democrat angle behind it.
 

getbush

Golden Member
Jan 19, 2001
1,771
0
0
Originally posted by: Corn
Another stupid thread where the OP doesn't have a fricken clue about what the heck he's talking about. The weather has very little effect on when leaves change in color. Color change is dependent on Chlorophyll production--something which is dependent on the length of daylight, not temperature. Even though you say it might not be global warming, your implication is clear, "something is happening".......

Unless that "something" is that the amount of daylight is getting longer now than in the past 12 years at this time of the year where you live........

This is worth repeating because it's really the only useful response in the thread. Leaves turning is a function of the length of daylight. Not Al Gore's current level of popularity/notoriety.
 

dyna

Senior member
Oct 20, 2006
813
61
91
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: dyna
This isn't unusual, imho. Same thing happen at Lake Travis, near Austin, TX. But there was record rainfall this year and it went from 40 ft low to 20 ft high.

The difference is the Army Corp is letting more water out of Lanier than coming in.

Interesting situation.

It's 100% Political with real lives on the line.

I'm sure there is a Republican Vs Democrat angle behind it.

Lake Travis is the same type of a lake, it feeds water into other water sources so they can remain constant level, regardless if its lake level is low or not. More water was leaving than was coming into it. Now my point is that because Lake Lanier is in that situation doesn't mean we have an environmental disaster in our midst.


I do support a greener earth. Although its not my #1 priority.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Climate != weather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate
Climate (from Ancient Greek klima) is commonly defined as the weather averaged over a long period of time. The standard averaging period is 30 years but other periods may be used depending on the purpose. Climate also includes statistics other than the average, such as the magnitudes of day-to-day or year-to-year variations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) glossary definition is:

Yes, thank you. Underlined for emphasis.

Thank you. Underlined, bolded and Italicilised for emphasis.

12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Climate != weather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate
Climate (from Ancient Greek klima) is commonly defined as the weather averaged over a long period of time. The standard averaging period is 30 years but other periods may be used depending on the purpose. Climate also includes statistics other than the average, such as the magnitudes of day-to-day or year-to-year variations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) glossary definition is:

Yes, thank you. Underlined for emphasis.

Thank you. Underlined, bolded and Italicilised for emphasis.

12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.

12/4billion

Lets put 12 years into perspective.

 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Climate != weather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate
Climate (from Ancient Greek klima) is commonly defined as the weather averaged over a long period of time. The standard averaging period is 30 years but other periods may be used depending on the purpose. Climate also includes statistics other than the average, such as the magnitudes of day-to-day or year-to-year variations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) glossary definition is:

Yes, thank you. Underlined for emphasis.

Thank you. Underlined, bolded and Italicilised for emphasis.

12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.

12/4billion

Lets put 12 years into perspective.

Don't be silly. 12 years of anecdotal evidence monitoring one small area of the Earth is clear, irrefutable evidence of "something".
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87

Luckily scientists are always trying to prove something and thus we will over the next century refine our techniques and detwemine how much we as a species are contributing. If it is a lot then we can work on curtailing emissions. If it is nearly nothing continue doing what we do.


Big conundrum.

Those pesky scientists think atmospheric pollution is masking the effects of man-made CO2/methane on climate change and that substantially reducing air pollution will further accelerate climate change.


 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: Corn
Another stupid thread where the OP doesn't have a fricken clue about what the heck he's talking about. The weather has very little effect on when leaves change in color. Color change is dependent on Chlorophyll production--something which is dependent on the length of daylight, not temperature. Even though you say it might not be global warming, your implication is clear, "something is happening".......

Unless that "something" is that the amount of daylight is getting longer now than in the past 12 years at this time of the year where you live........


Actually temperature, humidity and sunlight effect the tree and abscission, which cuts the flow of water to the leaf and prepares the tree for winter.

And if it's as dry in Vermont as it is around here(western North Carolina), brown seems to be the predominant color.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Climate != weather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate
Climate (from Ancient Greek klima) is commonly defined as the weather averaged over a long period of time. The standard averaging period is 30 years but other periods may be used depending on the purpose. Climate also includes statistics other than the average, such as the magnitudes of day-to-day or year-to-year variations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) glossary definition is:

Yes, thank you. Underlined for emphasis.

Thank you. Underlined, bolded and Italicilised for emphasis.

12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.

12/4billion

Lets put 12 years into perspective.

Don't be silly. 12 years of anecdotal evidence monitoring one small area of the Earth is clear, irrefutable evidence of "something".

regardless... its propper to use the term climate :p

 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,389
29
91
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: yllus
Climate != weather

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate
Climate (from Ancient Greek klima) is commonly defined as the weather averaged over a long period of time. The standard averaging period is 30 years but other periods may be used depending on the purpose. Climate also includes statistics other than the average, such as the magnitudes of day-to-day or year-to-year variations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) glossary definition is:

Yes, thank you. Underlined for emphasis.

Thank you. Underlined, bolded and Italicilised for emphasis.

12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.

12/4billion

Lets put 12 years into perspective.

Don't be silly. 12 years of anecdotal evidence monitoring one small area of the Earth is clear, irrefutable evidence of "something".

regardless... its propper to use the term climate :p

Please explain what "climate" actually has to do with the topic of discussion......which is Tech's observation that leaves are changing color later in the year today than 12 years ago.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: techs
When I moved to beautiful Vermont 12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.
Over the last 12 years the color seems have been pushed back almost 2 weeks. Now I understand that its not scientific, but it sure seems like there has been a major change.

You're not the only looney one Techs.

These Journalists and all the people they interview must be looney and liars too:

10-20-2007 Climate change blamed for fading foliage

EAST MONTPELIER, Vt. - Every fall, Marilyn Krom tries to make a trip to Vermont to see its famously beautiful fall foliage.

This year, she noticed something different about the autumn leaves

They're duller, not as sparkly, if you know what I mean," Krom, 62, a registered nurse from Eastford, Conn., said during a recent visit. "They're less vivid."

Other "leaf peepers" are noticing, too, and some believe climate change could be the reason.

Forested hillsides usually riotous with reds, oranges and yellows have shown their colors only grudgingly in recent years, with many trees going straight from the dull green of late summer to the rust-brown of late fall with barely a stop at a brighter hue.

"It's nothing like it used to be," said University of Vermont plant biologist Tom Vogelmann, a Vermont native.

He says autumn has become too warm to elicit New England's richest colors.

According to the National Weather Service, temperatures in Burlington have run above the 30-year averages in every September and October for the past four years, save for October 2004, when they were 0.2 degrees below average.

Colors emerge on leaves in the fall, when the green chlorophyll that has dominated all spring and summer breaks down.

But in order to hasten the decline of chlorophyll, cold nights are needed.

"The leaves fall off without ever becoming orange or yellow or red. They just go from green to brown," said Barry Rock, a forestry professor at the University of New Hampshire.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,950
10,294
136
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: techs
When I moved to beautiful Vermont 12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.
Over the last 12 years the color seems have been pushed back almost 2 weeks. Now I understand that its not scientific, but it sure seems like there has been a major change.

You're not the only looney one Techs.

These Journalists and all the people they interview must be looney and liars too:

10-20-2007 Climate change blamed for fading foliage

I thought we were past arguing whether or not the northern hemisphere is warmer lately than previous centuries. It?s a given, and the observations therein should also be obvious.

Yet then Dave comes barging in saying we all called everyone else lairs. I do so enjoy words shoved down my throat, don?t you?
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,688
126
When I was a kid, the pond in my town used to freeze all winter long, and people would skate on it every weekend (and sometimes weekday evenings) now the pond rarely freezes at all in the winter. If it does, it's skatable for maybe two or three weeks.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
..global warming= guilt driven eco-theism. and a great racket to make a ton of money. No matter what happens it's global warming. Your mountain view is just fine. 12 years isn't even a tick on the geological clock.
 

schmedy

Senior member
Dec 31, 1999
998
0
76
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: techs
When I moved to beautiful Vermont 12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.
Over the last 12 years the color seems have been pushed back almost 2 weeks. Now I understand that its not scientific, but it sure seems like there has been a major change.

You're not the only looney one Techs.

These Journalists and all the people they interview must be looney and liars too:

10-20-2007 Climate change blamed for fading foliage

I thought we were past arguing whether or not the northern hemisphere is warmer lately than previous centuries. It?s a given, and the observations therein should also be obvious.

Yet then Dave comes barging in saying we all called everyone else lairs. I do so enjoy words shoved down my throat, don?t you?

Looking at the NWS averages, it looks to me that highs in the past 100 years are not all in the past decade or so, lots of records in the early part of the 1900's, more so showing how the temperature cycles. I don't disagree it seems warmer, but is it a natural cycle or something else?

NWS Highs

NWS Temp Archives
 

CyberDuck

Senior member
Oct 10, 1999
258
0
0
Originally posted by: schmedy
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: techs
When I moved to beautiful Vermont 12 years ago I made note of when "peak color" was. In 1995 it was on Oct. 12. Well now, 12 years later, there is virtually no color yet.
Over the last 12 years the color seems have been pushed back almost 2 weeks. Now I understand that its not scientific, but it sure seems like there has been a major change.

You're not the only looney one Techs.

These Journalists and all the people they interview must be looney and liars too:

10-20-2007 Climate change blamed for fading foliage

I thought we were past arguing whether or not the northern hemisphere is warmer lately than previous centuries. It?s a given, and the observations therein should also be obvious.

Yet then Dave comes barging in saying we all called everyone else lairs. I do so enjoy words shoved down my throat, don?t you?

Looking at the NWS averages, it looks to me that highs in the past 100 years are not all in the past decade or so, lots of records in the early part of the 1900's, more so showing how the temperature cycles. I don't disagree it seems warmer, but is it a natural cycle or something else?

NWS Highs

NWS Temp Archives

"The understanding of anthropogenic warming and cooling influences on climate has improved since
the Third Assessment Report (TAR), leading to very high confidence that the globally averaged net
effect of human activities since 1750 has been one of warming, with a radiative forcing of +1.6 [+0.6 to
+2.4] W m-2."

"Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in
global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global
average sea level"

"Paleoclimate information supports the interpretation that the warmth of the last half century is
unusual in at least the previous 1300 years. The last time the polar regions were significantly warmer
than present for an extended period (about 125,000 years ago), reductions in polar ice volume led to 4
to 6 metres of sea level rise."

"Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very
likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. This is an
advance since the TAR?s conclusion that ?most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely
to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations?. Discernible human influences now
extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental-average temperatures,
temperature extremes and wind patterns"


From : IPCC - Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis - Summary for policymakers

Signed by the current US administration (and leaders from all around the world).

very likely = more than 90% certain