What information I find on this book, has absolutely nothing to do with race and subject matter. Rather, the opposition is entirely focused on the book's graphic descriptions.
Are you being honest if you ignore the actual complaints and the letter of the law(s) that they attempted to pass?
If you pretend this is solely about opposing the teaching of Black History? There is clear evidence that it is not about that.
The issue appears to be religious puritanical-ism, rather than Nazism. But if you are not going to hold an honest debate on the actual merits, then who is to say that they are wrong and you are correct? Calling every little thing Nazism does not bode well for your intentions. It is to stereotype every Conservative issue, the exact same thing they did towards Muslims and Terrorism following September 11th. Are you no better than them?
Banning and controversy
In 2007, twenty years after its 1987 publication, the novel was abruptly abandoned by an AP English class at Eastern High School in Louisville, Kentucky, at the order of the school's principal. The class had nearly reached the end of the book when a parent complained about language on page 13.
[41]
In Virginia,
Beloved was considered for removal from the Fairfax County senior English reading list due to a parent's 2017 complaint that "the book includes scenes of violent sex, including a gang rape, and was too graphic and extreme for teenagers".
[42] Parental concern about
Beloved's content inspired the
Beloved Bill, legislation that would have required Virginia public schools to
notify parents of any "sexually explicit content" and provide an alternative assignment if requested.
[43] The bill was vetoed by Governor Terry McAuliffe. When McAuliffe ran again for the governor's office in 2021, a major event in the election was his statement during a debate that, "Yeah, I stopped the bill that—I don't think parents should be telling schools what they should teach." His opponent, Glenn Youngkin, seized on the remark, and produced a television commercial in which a parent recounted her effort to get the book banned. The commercial did not mention the title, author, or subject of the book, but focused on the "explicit material" in the unnamed work.
[44][45]