VirtualLarry
No Lifer
Should Windows (sevices, etc.) be segregated from user-started applications, in terms of CPU cores utilized, and should they be limited?
For example, starting with 4-core or higher systems, should one core be reserved for the OS and background maintenance tasks? And increased to two (virtual) OS cores, for systems with 8 threads (4C/8T) or more?
This might eliminate "stuttering" in games, and prevent massive slowdowns, when Windows Update processes.
Any thoughts? This would be an optional setting. Maybe a slider, where the length is the number of total virtual cores in the system, and the partitioning would start at zero, on the left-hand side, and you could choose to have so many "OS-reserved cores", up to, say, 50% of total virtual cores.
For example, starting with 4-core or higher systems, should one core be reserved for the OS and background maintenance tasks? And increased to two (virtual) OS cores, for systems with 8 threads (4C/8T) or more?
This might eliminate "stuttering" in games, and prevent massive slowdowns, when Windows Update processes.
Any thoughts? This would be an optional setting. Maybe a slider, where the length is the number of total virtual cores in the system, and the partitioning would start at zero, on the left-hand side, and you could choose to have so many "OS-reserved cores", up to, say, 50% of total virtual cores.