I thought the claim was Ginni doesn't discuss these things with Clarence so why does she spousal privileges?Instead of executive privilege, she’s going to claim spousal privilege to avoid indicting her hubby. But watch, she’d still claim executive privilege to her communications with Meadows and Giuliani.
Lol that’s my point. Claiming privilege that won’t applyI thought the claim was Ginni doesn't discuss these things with Clarence so why does she spousal privileges?
Isn't executive privilege is for the President and to whom he communicates?
For the life of me, I still struggle to comprehend how the spouse of a Supreme Court justice could actually believe they were defending the Constitution by overthrowing it.
Maybe not enough evidence to get a criminal subpoena. She should have to testify in public.Can someone tell me why she is afforded any special treatment. Why not just give her a subpoena like anyone else who isn't a Supreme Court's wife would get.
Extremism in the pursuit of liberty isn't extremism bullshit. All actions done in the name of good or God can be justified by nobility of their purpose. There is one truth and she is its exponent. The fanaticism of certainty is the product of self hate, absolute denial that her notion of evil derives from being put down as a child for being bad. Her organic true self had to break under the strain. To heal you have to know you were broken and she will never do that absent some extraordinary event.For the life of me, I still struggle to comprehend how the spouse of a Supreme Court justice could actually believe they were defending the Constitution by overthrowing it.