- Apr 21, 2005
- 68
- 0
- 0
If you are chinese then go to this url for the Gigabyte IRAM review
http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/iramdisk-gbt-1.htm
If you can't read chinese, you can still go there to check out the pictures, I'll do the translation on the critical part of the review to point out some mistake that was made by Anandtech and Tomshardware's IRAM intro, I have no time to do a full translation of that review but if you have any questions after you finish reading this translation, you can make a reply and I'll see if I can find the answer to your question from that review and give you an update:
AT -> http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/iramdisk-gbt-1.htm
Chinese: ??????Gigabyte i-RAM
English: Worldwide Exclusive Review on Gigabyte i-RAM (they are the only one who made a review of IRAM and I think it seems to be true cuz even Anandtech and Tomshareware don't even have a review on it yet)
Chinese: Gigabyte i-RAM??4?180Pins?DIMM?,??2.5V?DDR?????,?????8GB??????,??????????????????????4GB
???,??Gigabyte i-RAM?????????????????????????,?????????????????????,????DDR400???? DDR266???????????!??,???????????????????,????????,????????Gigabyte i-RAM?,??????83.7MHz?DDR167.4.?????,???????????????????????????
English: Gigabyte IRAM has 4x DDR1 DIMM slot, support 2.5v DDR memory, max memory capacity of 8GB (that's 4x2GB, Anandtech said the max is 4GB), this kinda memory capacity is way more than any standard desktop machine that only has 4GB max memory capacity. Furthermore, Gigabyte also support memory with different size, different brand and different speed with no compatibility problem. Alot of reader get confused and asked "if they use DDR400 instead of DDR266 on IRAM, would it be faster?". The answer is NO, it doesn't matter what speed of DDR you use, they will all have the same performance because IRAM is only clocked at 83.7MHz/DDR167.4 (Anandtech said it's 100MHz/DDR200), by downclock the DDR memory to this speed it will decrease latency and increase stability.
Benchmark - Windows Boot UP
Gigabyte i-RAM: 6.42s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache: 13.17s
Benchmark - PCMark 04
Gigabyte i-RAM:
HDD Score: 57699
XP Startup: 102.193 MB/s
Application Loading: 100.503 MB/s
File Copying: 118.981 MB/s
General HDD Usage: 90.620 MB/s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
HDD Score: 4122
XP Startup: 7.348 MB/s
Application Loading: 5.918 MB/s
File Copying: 31.152 MB/s
General HDD Usage: 4.915 MB/s
Benchmark - Sandra 2005
Gigabyte i-RAM:
Drive Index: 132 MB/s
Buffered Read: 133 MB/s
Sequential Read: 133 MB/s
Random Read: 133 MB/s
Buffered Write: 126 MB/s
Sequential Write: 127 MB/s
Random Read: 127 MB/s
Average Random Access: -
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
Drive Index: 47 MB/s
Buffered Read: 40 MB/s
Sequential Read: 52 MB/s
Random Read: 38 MB/s
Buffered Write: 97 MB/s
Sequential Write: 54 MB/s
Random Read: 38 MB/s
Average Random Access: 8ms
Benchmark - Winbench 99
Gigabyte i-RAM:
Overall: 191000 KB/s
AVS/Express 3.4: 213000 KB/s
FrontPage 98: 409000 KB/s
MicroStation SE: 240000 KB/s
PhotoShop 4.0: 94500 KB/s
Premiere 4.2: 156000 KB/s
Sound Forge 4.0: 261000 KB/s
Visual C++ 5.0: 224000 KB/s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
Overall: 35200 KB/s
AVS/Express 3.4: 32600 KB/s
FrontPage 98: 282000 KB/s
MicroStation SE: 53200 KB/s
PhotoShop 4.0: 10900 KB/s
Premiere 4.2: 41500 KB/s
Sound Forge 4.0: 81700 KB/s
Visual C++ 5.0: 55600 KB/s
Benmark - HDTach 3.0
Gigabyte i-RAM:
Burst Speed: 137.4 MB/s
Radeon Access: 0.1 ms
Average Read: 131.2MB/s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
Burst Speed: 99MB /s
Radeon Access: 13 ms
Average Read: 46.9MB/s
Chinese: ???
?????RAMDisk,?????????????????????,Gigabyte i-RAM??4?180Pins?DIMM?,??2.5V?DDR?????,?????8GB??????,??????????????????????4GB
???,??Gigabytei-RAM????????RamDisk?????,?????????????????,???????Gigabyte?i-RAM????,?????????
?????????????Database?BT??(RAM???????Bad Sector)???,???????????
????Gigabyte????iRAM??????,????????????,?????????,??????? 80-100??(?????)???????2006??????DDR2??,???????????DDR?????iRAM,????????
English: Conclusion:
With Ramdisk as powerful as IRAM, the reviewers wanted to keep the IRAM for themselves so bad while doing the testing, Gigabyte IRAM have got rid of all weakness that you would expect from a traditional Ramdisk (software based), it has great performance and very safe to use, we would like to thank Gigabyte for making this product, alot of animator, database server and BT users (RAM won't get Bad Sectors like harddrive) will love IRAM, this product has great future.
We've been informed by Gigabyte saying that they are still making updates to their IRAM and the final product won't be out for awhile so we all have to wait patiently for now, the cost of the IRAM is about $80~100USD (does not include memory, Anandtech and Tomshareware said it's $60) and the price of this product is very fair, it will be a DDR2 era by year 2006 so alot of people will have some spare DDR1 memory left to use with IRAM so their DDR1 won't be wasted.
==========================================================
OK, HERE'S MY OWN CONCLUSION AND THOUGHTS ABOUT RAMDISK
About 2 years ago, I did a benchmark with Western Digital 8MB cache hard drive VS PC2100 DDR system memory using software Ramdisk, depends on the filesize, my system memory is 100~1000 times faster than my harddrive, the smaller the the file size the slower your hard drive is but with RAM it doesn't really slow down that much so it's very good for SQL database, I did a query on MySQL and it took almost a minute to finish on harddrive but it took less than 1 sec to finish on my system memory, when I do photoshop filtering effect on an image it took over 20 seconds to finish on my hard drive but it loads instantly on Ramdisk.
Software based Ramdisk is still good, because you can use your system memory that offer more speed and bandwidth compare to Gigabyte IRAM, the only bad part about software based Ramdisk is that it's driver based so you can't boot Windows on it, it make a backup of drive into image file to hard drive before your Windows shutdown then restore the drive image back to Ramdisk when Windows bootup.
Most of you might have heard of this company http://www.cenatek.com/ they made hardware based Ramdisk very simular to Gigabyte IRAM but they charge you over a thousand dollar for a card and that's a rip off compare to Gigabyte's IRAM, I think that's the main reason they unlinked their support forum from their website so they don't get flamed by people, you can still get the url to their support forum by searching google and here's the url:
http://forums.cenatek.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi
http://www.superspeed.com is a software based Ramdisk but they are also a ripoff just like Cenatek, they charge you hundreds of dollars for the Ramdisk software when you can get a simular product for only $9.99, superspeed charge you money for having different version of Windows so if you buy their WinXP version then you can't use it if you upgrade to Windows 2003 and you have to pay them again, with Ramdisk Enterprise for only $9.99 it's compatible with all version of Windows.
I am the primary distributor of Ramdisk Enterprise ($9.99 per license), if you are interested in software based RAMDisk feel free to contact me at service@duoservers.us
http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/iramdisk-gbt-1.htm
If you can't read chinese, you can still go there to check out the pictures, I'll do the translation on the critical part of the review to point out some mistake that was made by Anandtech and Tomshardware's IRAM intro, I have no time to do a full translation of that review but if you have any questions after you finish reading this translation, you can make a reply and I'll see if I can find the answer to your question from that review and give you an update:
AT -> http://www.hkepc.com/hwdb/iramdisk-gbt-1.htm
Chinese: ??????Gigabyte i-RAM
English: Worldwide Exclusive Review on Gigabyte i-RAM (they are the only one who made a review of IRAM and I think it seems to be true cuz even Anandtech and Tomshareware don't even have a review on it yet)
Chinese: Gigabyte i-RAM??4?180Pins?DIMM?,??2.5V?DDR?????,?????8GB??????,??????????????????????4GB
???,??Gigabyte i-RAM?????????????????????????,?????????????????????,????DDR400???? DDR266???????????!??,???????????????????,????????,????????Gigabyte i-RAM?,??????83.7MHz?DDR167.4.?????,???????????????????????????
English: Gigabyte IRAM has 4x DDR1 DIMM slot, support 2.5v DDR memory, max memory capacity of 8GB (that's 4x2GB, Anandtech said the max is 4GB), this kinda memory capacity is way more than any standard desktop machine that only has 4GB max memory capacity. Furthermore, Gigabyte also support memory with different size, different brand and different speed with no compatibility problem. Alot of reader get confused and asked "if they use DDR400 instead of DDR266 on IRAM, would it be faster?". The answer is NO, it doesn't matter what speed of DDR you use, they will all have the same performance because IRAM is only clocked at 83.7MHz/DDR167.4 (Anandtech said it's 100MHz/DDR200), by downclock the DDR memory to this speed it will decrease latency and increase stability.
Benchmark - Windows Boot UP
Gigabyte i-RAM: 6.42s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache: 13.17s
Benchmark - PCMark 04
Gigabyte i-RAM:
HDD Score: 57699
XP Startup: 102.193 MB/s
Application Loading: 100.503 MB/s
File Copying: 118.981 MB/s
General HDD Usage: 90.620 MB/s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
HDD Score: 4122
XP Startup: 7.348 MB/s
Application Loading: 5.918 MB/s
File Copying: 31.152 MB/s
General HDD Usage: 4.915 MB/s
Benchmark - Sandra 2005
Gigabyte i-RAM:
Drive Index: 132 MB/s
Buffered Read: 133 MB/s
Sequential Read: 133 MB/s
Random Read: 133 MB/s
Buffered Write: 126 MB/s
Sequential Write: 127 MB/s
Random Read: 127 MB/s
Average Random Access: -
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
Drive Index: 47 MB/s
Buffered Read: 40 MB/s
Sequential Read: 52 MB/s
Random Read: 38 MB/s
Buffered Write: 97 MB/s
Sequential Write: 54 MB/s
Random Read: 38 MB/s
Average Random Access: 8ms
Benchmark - Winbench 99
Gigabyte i-RAM:
Overall: 191000 KB/s
AVS/Express 3.4: 213000 KB/s
FrontPage 98: 409000 KB/s
MicroStation SE: 240000 KB/s
PhotoShop 4.0: 94500 KB/s
Premiere 4.2: 156000 KB/s
Sound Forge 4.0: 261000 KB/s
Visual C++ 5.0: 224000 KB/s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
Overall: 35200 KB/s
AVS/Express 3.4: 32600 KB/s
FrontPage 98: 282000 KB/s
MicroStation SE: 53200 KB/s
PhotoShop 4.0: 10900 KB/s
Premiere 4.2: 41500 KB/s
Sound Forge 4.0: 81700 KB/s
Visual C++ 5.0: 55600 KB/s
Benmark - HDTach 3.0
Gigabyte i-RAM:
Burst Speed: 137.4 MB/s
Radeon Access: 0.1 ms
Average Read: 131.2MB/s
Seagate 80GB 7200rpm 8MB Cache:
Burst Speed: 99MB /s
Radeon Access: 13 ms
Average Read: 46.9MB/s
Chinese: ???
?????RAMDisk,?????????????????????,Gigabyte i-RAM??4?180Pins?DIMM?,??2.5V?DDR?????,?????8GB??????,??????????????????????4GB
???,??Gigabytei-RAM????????RamDisk?????,?????????????????,???????Gigabyte?i-RAM????,?????????
?????????????Database?BT??(RAM???????Bad Sector)???,???????????
????Gigabyte????iRAM??????,????????????,?????????,??????? 80-100??(?????)???????2006??????DDR2??,???????????DDR?????iRAM,????????
English: Conclusion:
With Ramdisk as powerful as IRAM, the reviewers wanted to keep the IRAM for themselves so bad while doing the testing, Gigabyte IRAM have got rid of all weakness that you would expect from a traditional Ramdisk (software based), it has great performance and very safe to use, we would like to thank Gigabyte for making this product, alot of animator, database server and BT users (RAM won't get Bad Sectors like harddrive) will love IRAM, this product has great future.
We've been informed by Gigabyte saying that they are still making updates to their IRAM and the final product won't be out for awhile so we all have to wait patiently for now, the cost of the IRAM is about $80~100USD (does not include memory, Anandtech and Tomshareware said it's $60) and the price of this product is very fair, it will be a DDR2 era by year 2006 so alot of people will have some spare DDR1 memory left to use with IRAM so their DDR1 won't be wasted.
==========================================================
OK, HERE'S MY OWN CONCLUSION AND THOUGHTS ABOUT RAMDISK
About 2 years ago, I did a benchmark with Western Digital 8MB cache hard drive VS PC2100 DDR system memory using software Ramdisk, depends on the filesize, my system memory is 100~1000 times faster than my harddrive, the smaller the the file size the slower your hard drive is but with RAM it doesn't really slow down that much so it's very good for SQL database, I did a query on MySQL and it took almost a minute to finish on harddrive but it took less than 1 sec to finish on my system memory, when I do photoshop filtering effect on an image it took over 20 seconds to finish on my hard drive but it loads instantly on Ramdisk.
Software based Ramdisk is still good, because you can use your system memory that offer more speed and bandwidth compare to Gigabyte IRAM, the only bad part about software based Ramdisk is that it's driver based so you can't boot Windows on it, it make a backup of drive into image file to hard drive before your Windows shutdown then restore the drive image back to Ramdisk when Windows bootup.
Most of you might have heard of this company http://www.cenatek.com/ they made hardware based Ramdisk very simular to Gigabyte IRAM but they charge you over a thousand dollar for a card and that's a rip off compare to Gigabyte's IRAM, I think that's the main reason they unlinked their support forum from their website so they don't get flamed by people, you can still get the url to their support forum by searching google and here's the url:
http://forums.cenatek.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi
http://www.superspeed.com is a software based Ramdisk but they are also a ripoff just like Cenatek, they charge you hundreds of dollars for the Ramdisk software when you can get a simular product for only $9.99, superspeed charge you money for having different version of Windows so if you buy their WinXP version then you can't use it if you upgrade to Windows 2003 and you have to pay them again, with Ramdisk Enterprise for only $9.99 it's compatible with all version of Windows.
I am the primary distributor of Ramdisk Enterprise ($9.99 per license), if you are interested in software based RAMDisk feel free to contact me at service@duoservers.us