- Jan 20, 2001
- 10,737
- 0
- 0
AMA News (extensive excerpts but I recommend you check the link)
I'm not saying it's always a zero sum game . . . someone pays and someone else benefits. But Potter and his ilk are leeches in the system that are two to three orders of magnitude worse than an army of trial lawyers.
Hmm, must be those damn trial lawyers.This is an old story to Dr. Holmes, but the profit levels of most large insurers are surging with an exuberance that's catching the attention of Wall Street anew. Six of the seven largest health plans saw their profits increase in 2004 -- California-based Health Net was the only one to see a decline. Aetna and CIGNA saw their profits more than double. Aetna's were up 136% and CIGNA's were up 128%.
We need tort reform!!HMO premiums increased by about 10% to 12% last year on average, about two to three times the rate of inflation, Mercurio said. At the same time, medical cost increases fell from 7.8% to 6.4% last year, said Isabelle Roman-Barrio, a senior financial analyst at New Jersey-based A.M. Best Co.
"There's a lot of talk of medical care and technology and pharmaceuticals rising in cost, so that managed care companies feel justified in raising their rates," Dr. Holmes said. "But rates are far exceeding the [pace at which] the costs are going up."
Be aware that "growth in revenue" means mad $$ out of taxpayer and business pockets.Celerant's survey of 30 managed care executives found six out of 10 expect growth in revenues in 2005. This is the second-highest level of optimism for any industry polled by Celerant, trailing only the telecommunications field.
Basically they cut you lose if you get sick and then they raise the rates on the healthy people leftover.Wendell Potter, a spokesman for Philadelphia-based CIGNA, said his company more than doubled its earnings through a standard turnaround strategy that included raising many members' premiums and identifying and dropping the lines of business that are least profitable -- a move that has trimmed its member rolls by roughly 10% since the end of 2003.
This is a pretty standard bait-and-switch. There's plenty of evidence that disease mitigation efforts can improve care and reduce costs. But it takes YEARS to see such benefits. This article is talking about profit growth occuring over ONE YEAR.Potter rejected the idea that the profit levels attained by plans should be viewed by physicians as money extracted from the health care system, or from physicians' incomes.
He gave disease management programs as an example of initiatives that companies such as CIGNA are building up and which require funding. These will assist both patients and physicians by increasing the quality and efficiency of care in the long run, he said.
I'm not saying it's always a zero sum game . . . someone pays and someone else benefits. But Potter and his ilk are leeches in the system that are two to three orders of magnitude worse than an army of trial lawyers.
I gave the last word to the MD b/c . . . well . . . those my peeps. IMHO, doctors and certainly the AMA has failed to serve the population very well over the past few decades. But having said that . . . at least we actually provide care. Doctors are becoming the elite college basketball player. In general, we get token compensation while we produce virtually ALL of the product/service of value. Fans/consumers demand more while complaining we get too much. In the meantime, a select group of individuals collect mad bank b/c they "facilitate" the transaction."They expect the doctors to do more, which is OK," Dr. Wasylik said. "Doctors want to do more. But we don't have the staff to do that if we can't hire employees. [Insurers] absolutely won't acknowledge the fact that we need adequate reimbursements. They're making double the profits. Can't they give doctors just a little of that? The public sees managed care as making a lot of money and they think it's going to the physician, and it's not."