Ghostbusters 3 is happening

[Sonikku]

Ramis is dead, Murray is out and Ivan Reitman just bailed as director. Sony figured it's time to give it the green light.

http://metro.co.uk/2014/03/19/ghost...g-in-2015-yes-its-actually-happening-4650878/

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1724405/ghostbusters-3-fantasy-casting.jhtml

 

[GagHalfrunt]

Maybe the ghost of Ramis will appear.

 

[poofyhairguy]

Wasn't that recent game the plot of the third movie? Spoiler alert?

 

[Fritzo]

The game was great fun BTW

I think they should just make Ghostbusters 1 and start over.

 

[KB]

I can see it already. Ray finds out he had a long lost son who's a biker, played by Shia Labuof. They bond while fighting ghosts, but meet aliens in the process. 5 stars.

 

[Thump553]

This could be worse than the prequel to Dumb and Dumber.

 

[88keys]

All I gotta say is....... called that shit!

 

[JamesV]

I can see it already. Ray finds out he had a long lost son who's a biker, played by Shia Labuof. They bond while fighting ghosts, but Shia's girlfriend, an incredibly hot model (which should have been a warning), turns into a rampaging demon. The age old question - keep the hot girl, or let her destroy the world so you can be with her. 6 stars.

Fixed

 

[I Saw OJ]

So no Murray, Ramis, or Moranis? Come on...

 

[Scarpozzi]

I can see it already. Ray finds out he had a long lost son who's a biker, played by Shia Labuof. They bond while fighting ghosts, but meet aliens in the process. 5 stars.

Oddly, Karen Allen was in Animal House (cowritten by Harold Ramis)....and the reference you made... Not sure how dreamy she is these days, but Ray could break out his mood slime and see where it leads.

 

[IHateMyJob2004]

The uk article infers that Ivan Reitman is involved.

 

[IHateMyJob2004]

This is going to be awesome or horrible. There is no in between. PRAYing for awesome.

Who could play them? You need a proper mix:
1) nerd/scientist
2) Sexist lazy guy
3) ????
4) Average Joe that reminds you of a sports fan.

I think NONE of the original ghostbusters should show up in this. Murray is right.

 

[JulesMaximus]

 

[Fritzo]

This is going to be awesome or horrible. There is no in between. PRAYing for awesome.

Who could play them? You need a proper mix:
1) nerd/scientist
2) Sexist lazy guy
3) ????
4) Average Joe that reminds you of a sports fan.

I think NONE of the original ghostbusters should show up in this. Murray is right.

1) nerd/scientist
2) Sexist lazy guy
Simon pegg and Nick frost

3) ????
Egon- I'm not sure. Maybe Will Arnet?

4) Average Joe that reminds you of a sports fan.
Chris Tucker

 

[GunsMadeAmericaFree]

I can only hope that after 25 years, they won't just call it "Ghostbusters 3". The second one was as terrible as the first was good! It's time to start over.

If they're smart, it will either simply be a slight change to the spelling (to differentiate from the original), or else they would use the original along with a descriptor. (for example, Ghostbusters: Bermuda Triangle)

 

[MartyMcFly3]

I don't have high hopes for this.

 

[zinfamous]

I can only hope that after 25 years, they won't just call it "Ghostbusters 3". The second one was as terrible as the first was good! It's time to start over.

wha? The 2nd one was pretty damn good.

 

[Sonikku]

I did enjoy the second one. But it seems awful as a 7 because the first movie was a 10 in comparison.

 

[surfsatwerk]

I enjoyed the 2nd one.

 

[gorcorps]

I can only hope that after 25 years, they won't just call it "Ghostbusters 3". The second one was as terrible as the first was good! It's time to start over.

If they're smart, it will either simply be a slight change to the spelling (to differentiate from the original), or else they would use the original along with a descriptor. (for example, Ghostbusters: Bermuda Triangle)

Can't agree with you there. Ghostbusters 2 was still pretty entertaining. Not as good, but I liked it.

 

[Fritzo]

Can't agree with you there. Ghostbusters 2 was still pretty entertaining. Not as good, but I liked it.

That slime thing got annoying. The remote control Statue of Liberty sealed it for me.

 

[GagHalfrunt]

Can't agree with you there. Ghostbusters 2 was still pretty entertaining. Not as good, but I liked it.

+1

Judged entirely on its own merits Ghostbusters 2 was a decent movie. While it was far from being a comedy classic it was also far from being a waste of time. It only looked bad in comparison to the original.

 

[poofyhairguy]

That slime thing got annoying. The remote control Statue of Liberty sealed it for me.

I didn't like the baby.

 

[88keys]

I can only hope that after 25 years, they won't just call it "Ghostbusters 3". The second one was as terrible as the first was good! It's time to start over.

If they're smart, it will either simply be a slight change to the spelling (to differentiate from the original), or else they would use the original along with a descriptor. (for example, Ghostbusters: Bermuda Triangle)

How can you call Ghostbusters 2 terrible? Granted it's not as good as the 1st, but it's still very enjoyable.

 

[jagec]

I can only hope that after 25 years, they won't just call it "Ghostbusters 3". The second one was as terrible as the first was good! It's time to start over.

If they're smart, it will either simply be a slight change to the spelling (to differentiate from the original), or else they would use the original along with a descriptor. (for example, Ghostbusters: Bermuda Triangle)

Ghastbusters?