• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GF5 6000 - 54,014 3D Marks

Apparently NVIDIA is not one to be left behind?we have proof from a reliable source ( he only sent this picture to me?and 1000 other of his closest webmaster friends ) This picture is total undeniable proof that NVIDIA used the 3dfx technology to unleash the GeForce5 6000!!! I have further proof from my friend, who is close to NVIDIA, that the GF5-6000 is getting an astonishing 54014 3DMarks!!! I cannot reveal the persons true identity out of fear of retaliation from former 3dfx employees?so he sent me this from his Yahoo account under the name ?Emilio?. Remember you saw it here first?.
Click to expand...

Sounds like a windup to me.
 
Take a look at that picture

It is so obviously faked. In the orientation of that pic, take a look at the bottom edge of the top heatsink and the top edge of the bottom heatisink...you can't tell me that they are at different angles!

LOL! Look at the "benchmark" too! Intel have jumped the gun a bit and totally missed the Pentium 5 and moved to the Pentium 6!

What was that, their april fools edition?
Click to expand...

I guess so, and Chu fell for it hook, line and sinker! 😛

Confused
 
You know, even if those were real 3DMark Scores, that card would suck at high resolution games. Look at the Game1 High Chase-High Detail. It went from 422.2FPS in Low Detail to 78.7FPS in High Detail, to me that really sucks! Another thing, I think that would be impossible to fit in a standard ATX case, or any case for that matter. I think someone is having a little too much fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top