I live pretty close to the main campus at my school. I can get a decent signal with my ancient laptop's Orinoco card just about 150 ft. from my apartment. In my apartment, all I get is a spotty connection to some of my neighbors' networks.
If I could boost my reception just a little bit, I could get perfectly legal free connection to my school's wireless and not have to pay for a cable modem. It's about $40/mo for a cable modem, so I'd be willing to spend a little over $100 to then get free access (don't want to spend too much if it doesn't work).
I don't currently have any wireless adapter in my desktop, so I was thinking of getting this:
D-Link DWL-G550 AirPremier High-Powered Wireless 108G Desktop Adapter
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16833127167
It's got a 5dBi antenna. That might be enough, because may laptop comes pretty close (my laptop has about 70% of the range I need), so I don't need much more range than my Orinoco card already has with its built-in antenna.
But, would I be better off just getting a cheaper adapter and buying an antenna separately? It might be fun to get something like this:
2.4 GHz Range Extender 8.5 dBi Omni with Mag Base
http://sharperconcepts.zoovy.com/product/YSC-RE09U
Can't I just take that and plug it into any PCI Wi-Fi card with an external antenna? I can't really get any big outdoor antennas -- I'm not going to go drilling holes in the outside of my apartment, so I'm assuming anything beyond that 8.5 dBi antenna would be serious overkill. And if I got the 8.5 dBi antenna, would there really be any benefit to getting the "high-powered" D-Link adapter? It does list slightly higher transmit power than I can find for other cards, but most of what I see says the antenna is by far the most important thing.
Or would I be better off getting a directional antenna and just pointing it at my school's closest access point?
I'll probably just get that D-Link card since I've spent so much at NewEgg that they'll let me send if back if the idea is a total bust (or I could add a better antenna later). Just wondering if anybody had any better suggestions.
Thanks.
If I could boost my reception just a little bit, I could get perfectly legal free connection to my school's wireless and not have to pay for a cable modem. It's about $40/mo for a cable modem, so I'd be willing to spend a little over $100 to then get free access (don't want to spend too much if it doesn't work).
I don't currently have any wireless adapter in my desktop, so I was thinking of getting this:
D-Link DWL-G550 AirPremier High-Powered Wireless 108G Desktop Adapter
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16833127167
It's got a 5dBi antenna. That might be enough, because may laptop comes pretty close (my laptop has about 70% of the range I need), so I don't need much more range than my Orinoco card already has with its built-in antenna.
But, would I be better off just getting a cheaper adapter and buying an antenna separately? It might be fun to get something like this:
2.4 GHz Range Extender 8.5 dBi Omni with Mag Base
http://sharperconcepts.zoovy.com/product/YSC-RE09U
Can't I just take that and plug it into any PCI Wi-Fi card with an external antenna? I can't really get any big outdoor antennas -- I'm not going to go drilling holes in the outside of my apartment, so I'm assuming anything beyond that 8.5 dBi antenna would be serious overkill. And if I got the 8.5 dBi antenna, would there really be any benefit to getting the "high-powered" D-Link adapter? It does list slightly higher transmit power than I can find for other cards, but most of what I see says the antenna is by far the most important thing.
Or would I be better off getting a directional antenna and just pointing it at my school's closest access point?
I'll probably just get that D-Link card since I've spent so much at NewEgg that they'll let me send if back if the idea is a total bust (or I could add a better antenna later). Just wondering if anybody had any better suggestions.
Thanks.