- Apr 30, 2003
- 80
- 0
- 0
A review I read at Tom's Hardware mentioned how unstable their Barton 2500 was when running @ 200mhz. They blamed it on no available platforms at the time that could support a stable 200mhz much less keep it synchronous with ddr400 memory. That review was on Feb 10th.
I also read at HardOCP that they could get the T-bred 2400 up to 200mhz without a fuss.
I really want to utilize DDR400 memory but can't figure out which core to use. I'm tempted by the Barton 2500 because of the higher stock frequency, which means (in theory) that I could go even higher than 400. But I also read that the Barton has issues with getting the multiplier unlocked.
As it is, I'm leaning toward the 2400 in hopes of getting "3000+" speeds @ 200mhz, which would be a great experience for a first-time ocer. Thoughts?
I also read at HardOCP that they could get the T-bred 2400 up to 200mhz without a fuss.
I really want to utilize DDR400 memory but can't figure out which core to use. I'm tempted by the Barton 2500 because of the higher stock frequency, which means (in theory) that I could go even higher than 400. But I also read that the Barton has issues with getting the multiplier unlocked.
As it is, I'm leaning toward the 2400 in hopes of getting "3000+" speeds @ 200mhz, which would be a great experience for a first-time ocer. Thoughts?
