George Soros, making the Koch brothers look like amatures

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
All the rage against the Koch brothers, and yet we hear nothing about Soros who makes them look like rank amateurs.

$27 million spent trying to defeat Bush? No big deal to the liberals I guess.

Million spent supporting 'progressive' news organizations? No media bias here.

George is free to spend his money where he wants, but the fact that so many liberals on here cry about the Koch brothers while ignoring Soros is pathetic.


When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio , it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.

Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalists' ethical code stating: “avoid all conflicts real or perceived.”

This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.

The investigative reporting start-up ProPublica is a prime example. ProPublica, which recently won its second Pulitzer Prize, initially was given millions of dollars from the Sandler Foundation to “strengthen the progressive infrastructure” – “progressive” being the code word for very liberal. In 2010, it also received a two-year contribution of $125,000 each year from the Open Society Foundations. In case you wonder where that money comes from, the OSF website is www.soros.org. It is a network of more than 30 international foundations, mostly funded by Soros, who has contributed more than $8 billion to those efforts.

The ProPublica stories are thoroughly researched by top-notch staffers who used to work at some of the biggest news outlets in the nation. But the topics are almost laughably left-wing. The site’s proud list of “Our Investigations” includes attacks on oil companies, gas companies, the health care industry, for-profit schools and more. More than 100 stories on the latest lefty cause: opposition to drilling for natural gas by hydraulic fracking. Another 100 on the evils of the foreclosure industry.

Throw in a couple investigations making the military look bad and another about prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and you have almost the perfect journalism fantasy – a huge budget, lots of major media partners and a liberal agenda unconstrained by advertising.

One more thing: a 14-person Journalism Advisory Board, stacked with CNN’s David Gergen and representatives from top newspapers, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal and the editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster. Several are working journalists, including:

• Jill Abramson, a managing editor of The New York Times;

• Kerry Smith, the senior vice president for editorial quality of ABC News;

• Cynthia A. Tucker, the editor of the editorial page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

ProPublica is far from the only Soros-funded organization that is stacked with members of the supposedly neutral press.

The Center for Public Integrity is another great example. Its board of directors is filled with working journalists like Amanpour from ABC, right along side blatant liberal media types like Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post and now AOL.

Like ProPublica, the CPI board is a veritable Who’s Who of journalism and top media organizations, including:

• Christiane Amanpour – Anchor of ABC’s Sunday morning political affairs program, “This Week with Christiane Amanpour.” A reliable lefty, she has called tax cuts “giveaways,” the Tea Party “extreme,” and Obama “very Reaganesque.”

• Paula Madison – Executive vice president and chief diversity officer for NBC Universal, who leads NBC Universal’s corporate diversity initiatives, spanning all broadcast television, cable, digital, and film properties.

• Matt Thompson – Editorial product manager at National Public Radio and an adjunct faculty member at the prominent Poynter Institute.

The group's advisory board features:

• Ben Sherwood, ABC News president and former "Good Morning America" executive producer

Once again, like ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity’s investigations are mostly liberal – attacks on the coal industry, payday loans and conservatives like Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour. The Center for Public Integrity is also more open about its politics, including a detailed investigation into conservative funders David and Charles Koch and their “web of influence.”According to the center’s own 990 tax forms, the Open Society Institute gave it $651,650 in 2009 alone.

The well-known Center for Investigative Reporting follows the same template – important journalists on the board and a liberal editorial agenda. Both the board of directors and the advisory board contain journalists from major news outlets. The board features:

• Phil Bronstein (President), San Francisco Chronicle;

• David Boardman, The Seattle Times;

• Len Downie, former Executive Editor of the Washington Post, now VP;

• George Osterkamp, CBS News producer.

Readers of the site are greeted with numerous stories on climate change, illegal immigration and the evils of big companies. It counts among its media partners The Washington Post, Salon, CNN and ABC News. CIR received close to $1 million from Open Society from 2003 to 2008.

Why does it all matter? Journalists, we are constantly told, are neutral in their reporting. In almost the same breath, many bemoan the influence of money in politics. It is a maxim of both the left and many in the media that conservatives are bought and paid for by business interests. Yet where are the concerns about where their money comes from?

Fred Brown, who recently revised the book “Journalism Ethics: A Casebook of Professional Conduct for News Media,” argues journalists need to be “transparent” about their connections and “be up front about your relationship” with those who fund you.

Unfortunately, that rarely happens. While the nonprofits list who sits on their boards, the news outlets they work for make little or no effort to connect those dots. Amanpour’s biography page, for instance, talks about her lengthy career, her time at CNN and her many awards. It makes no mention of her affiliation with the Center for Public Integrity.

If journalists were more up front, they would have to admit numerous uncomfortable connections with groups that push a liberal agenda, many of them funded by the stridently liberal George Soros. So don’t expect that transparency any time soon.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011...es-30-major-news-organizations/#ixzz1M8trgdMt
BTW if you don't like the fact that this is from Foxnews then click the link and follow all the links in the articles that point to outside sources.
 

Gardener

Senior member
Nov 22, 1999
767
548
136
Professor John cut and paste porn star.

You know you actually list David Gergen, former Bush press secretary. And if you weren't such a fraken retard, you would be funny.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Professor John cut and paste porn star.

You know you actually list David Gergen, former Bush press secretary. And if you weren't such a fraken retard, you would be funny.
ummm Gergen never even worked for Bush, unless you are talking about Bush 41 whom he served as an advisor.

He also worked for Clinton and calls himself an independent.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
BTW if you don't like the fact that this is from Foxnews then click the link and follow all the links in the articles that point to outside sources.

Ahh yes, the rightwing echo chamber. Explore the site Projo linked- their people commonly write for World Nut Daily, appear as talking heads on Hannity, so forth and so on.

They've just nervous about having honest competition, use the normal innuendo and attribution of the fringe w/o actually attacking the substance of what Pro Publica has offered so far...

Here's the Home of the article reprinted by Fox- Notice that they don't say where their money comes from, at all...

http://www.mrc.org/bmi/default.aspx
 

Gardener

Senior member
Nov 22, 1999
767
548
136
For Professor John, uncoverer of David Gergen's closet communism

(From Wikipedia)


Gergen at the 2008 World Economic Forum
David Richmond Gergen (born May 9, 1942) is an American political consultant and former presidential advisor who served during the administrations of Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Clinton. He is currently Director of the Center for Public Leadership and a professor of public service at Harvard Kennedy School.[1] Gergen is the Editor-at-large for U.S. News and World Report and the Senior Political Analyst for CNN.[2]

Contents
1 Family and education
2 Professional career 2.1 Political activity
2.2 Educational, journalistic and other professional activities

3 See also
4 References
5 External links


Family and education

David Gergen was born in Durham, North Carolina. He is the youngest of four children of Aubigne Munger (née Lermond) and Dr. John Jay Gergen, who once chaired Duke University's mathematics department.[3][4][5] His brother, Kenneth J. Gergen, is a psychologist and professor at Swarthmore College.[6]

Gergen served in the U.S. Navy for three-and-a-half years, serving on a ship home-ported in Japan.[7] Gergen earned his bachelor's degree from Yale University in 1963 and was a member of Manuscript Society. In 1967, he received his law degree from Harvard Law School. In 1967, Gergen married Anne Gergen of England. She is a family therapist; they live in Cambridge, Massachusetts. They have two children, Christopher and Katherine, and four grandchildren.

Professional career

Political activity

Gergen has served four presidents including Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Gergen joined the Nixon White House in 1971, as a staff assistant on the speech writing team, a group that included Pat Buchanan, Ben Stein, and William Safire. Two years later, he took over as the director. Gergen went on to become the Director of Communications for President Gerald Ford and President Ronald Reagan, a counselor on domestic and foreign affairs for President Bill Clinton and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, and an adviser to the 1980 George H.W. Bush presidential campaign. Despite his long-standing association with Republicans, Gergen has stated that he is actually an independent.[8][9]

[edit] Educational, journalistic and other professional activities

Following his years in public service, Gergen worked as a political journalist, commentator, editor, teacher, public servant, and is a best-selling author. He was the first managing editor of Public Opinion, a magazine affiliated with the American Enterprise Institute,and from 1985-1986 he worked as an editor at U.S. News & World Report. Following his service in the Clinton administration, Gergen resumed his relationship with U.S. News, and currently serves as editor-at-large. In 2000, he published a New York Times bestseller book, Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership, Nixon to Clinton.

Gergen’s career in television began in 1985, when he joined the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour for Friday night discussions of politics. During that period, he was a regular commentator for five years on the NewsHour, providing a conservative viewpoint counterposed to that of Mark Shields. During his tenure, Gergen had the opportunity to interview many leading intellectuals. Gergen also moderated PBS's World@Large discussion program for two seasons.[9] In addition, he has also appeared on MSNBC Hardball with Chris Matthews, CBS and The Colbert Report. Currently[when?], Gergen is a Senior Political Analyst for CNN and frequently appears on Anderson Cooper 360 and The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer. Gergen has also been a guest on NPR.

Gergen's frequent television appearances as a political commentator and pundit occasionally made him the target of satire. In a biting critique of the pedantic and frequently self-evident predictions made on some televised political talk programs, humorist Joe Bob Briggs made the observation that David Gergen bore an uncanny resemblance to The Cat in the Hat.[10]

Gergen has been actively involved in higher education. As of 2006, Gergen has been a professor of public service at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government and director of its Center for Public Leadership.[11] A Durham native, Gergen has also taught at Duke University from 1995 to 1999. Today he is now a trustee. Gergen served as Elon University's inaugural Isabella Cannon Distinguished Visiting Professor of Leadership and as the Chair of the Elon University School of Law Advisory Board. Gergen is active on many non-profit boards and is Chairman of the National Selection Committee for the Ford Foundation’s program on Innovations in American Government. He is an active as a speaker on leadership and sits on many boards, including Teach for America and the Aspen Institute. He is a member of the Washington D.C. Bar and the Council on Foreign Relations, and holds 21 honorary degrees.[7] He is a past member of Bohemian Grove[12][13] and the Trilateral Commission.[14]
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Professor John cut and paste porn star.

You know you actually list David Gergen, former Bush press secretary. And if you weren't such a fraken retard, you would be funny.

So he wasn't Bush's press secretary? Because all I see in your cut and paste is that he was an adviser on Bush I's campaign. Also it appears that his more recent activity, well, we've got CNN, CBS, Colbert, 360, NPR, and the Situation Room, seems pretty not republican to me.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,947
126
pj you know you are pwned when the lurker who has 47 posts in 12 years comes out and drop kicks you.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
pj you know you are pwned when the lurker who has 47 posts in 12 years comes out and drop kicks you.

Pwned by a lurker that posted an article to prove his point that discredited his own "pwnage"?
 

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
Let's take Soros, Koch and moneyed special interests out of politics all together!
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
"There is a computer monitor on my desk."
Conservative: "OMG he didn't say how it awful that is and how it's all Obama's fault! LIBERAL BIAS!"


Pretty sad when cooking shows, car talk, and flat news stated within the perspective of learned people is treated as being the equal of 24/7 conservative spin.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Money -- whether from individuals or corporations -- dominates politics. Lets not be naive and think the money only flows in one direction or from one source. I don't particularly care if it's Soros, the Koch brothers or anyone else, it's very clear the money flows freely to buy influence.

ProJo's point about Soros is valid though. For all the complaints about the Koch brothers and their involvement in politics, there's not as much scrutiny on Soros, who is equally involved.

The real question is, how do you curb this kind of undue influence without stomping all over civil rights like freedom of speech?
 

bradley

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2000
3,671
2
81
I believe voters who feed into the whole left-right paradigm place our liberty and freedom into the greatest peril. Asking whether George Soros or the Koch brothers are worse is like asking whether your death would be less painful from cancer or AIDS. Both slowly drain the life out of you.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
You know it's weird, the only time I ever hear about the Koch Borthers or George Soros is when one of their opposite extremes decides to post about it. And I read the news more than most...

Inference: The guy is a pundit who largely stays in the fantasy land of the internet and his own followers unless given undue attention.

Just food for thought.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,824
2,611
136
I suspect the Koch brothers (secretly) fund political organizations more in a week than Soros does in a year. Righties get bent all out of shape about Soros because: (1) claiming the left is propped up by Soros is a central Faux News talking point and (2) unlike the Koch brothers-who have an obsession with secrecy, Soros has an obsession with full disclosure and makes no effort to conceal what he does.

BTW PJ, where is your thread about the gangsta thug (Common) the Obamas had reading poetry at the White House earlier this week? Did you miss the memo?