zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,857
- 31,346
- 146
Sephire
Golden Member
- Feb 9, 2011
- 1,689
- 3
- 76
Xylon added another YouTube video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVNeHGr8Rk&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=SP73D0707E79432801
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVNeHGr8Rk&feature=list_related&playnext=1&list=SP73D0707E79432801
Last edited:
Lulz, the Blu-Ray where they added the rock in front of R2-D2. :biggrin:
JHumeC....haha. It looks like a bad photoshop.
Lulz, the Blu-Ray where they added the rock in front of R2-D2. :biggrin:
JHumeC....haha. It looks like a bad photoshop.
That's not bad at all. And it doesn't even begin to approach the level of awful of the special edition CGI.
mmntech
Lifer
- Sep 20, 2007
- 17,501
- 12
- 0
You have the Ring, and I see your Schwartz is as big as mine...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S25Zf8svHZQ
Id have to agree with him, actually. I don't see anything in it that the average person would notice. Now I assume your profession has something to do with graphics design, or movie editing. If thats the case, props to you for noticing slight lighting issues, blurriness, or the lack thereof.
Id bet that 95% of people given that picture would never notice the issue. Right?
First, I was just joking around. My fault, it didn't come across.
Well if we're gonna qualify it like that, then yeah, the average person won't notice. I still think it looks like crap though and is laughably bad. That image just looks wrong. You don't need to know much to be able to tell that. If I didn't know better, then I would have guessed they shopped R2-D2 into the picture. Sums up Lucas' attitude, change pointless things for no real reason and do a half-ass job at that.
SKORPI0
Lifer
- Jan 18, 2000
- 18,481
- 2,418
- 136
gorcorps
aka Brandon
- Jul 18, 2004
- 30,741
- 456
- 126
It's a shame that so much was added/changed that detract from the original, because apart from that it looks damn good. Everything actually shot with real cameras have so much detail that all of the sub par c-gen added in the late 90s really distracts you.
The Boston Dangler
Lifer
- Mar 10, 2005
- 14,647
- 2
- 0
star wars, in its original form and condition, was crap. how about the glaring spliced film surrounding fighters? and the lightsabers looked pretty weak too.
0roo0roo
No Lifer
- Sep 21, 2002
- 64,795
- 84
- 91
http://www.screened.com/news/behind-the-scenes-of-harmys-star-wars-despecialized-edition/2917/
he has been stopped, now if only someone would do it from the bluray source as well.
he has been stopped, now if only someone would do it from the bluray source as well.
ProfJohn
Lifer
- Jul 28, 2006
- 18,161
- 7
- 0
So... in plain English....
Should I guy the blu-ray?
Yes or No?
I saw it playing at Walmart and damn it looks sharp. It was similar to watching Star Wars when it was re-released into the theaters. Just amazing how much sharper it looked on the big screen and blu-ray than what I was used to seeing over all these years on VHS and DVD.
Should I guy the blu-ray?
Yes or No?
I saw it playing at Walmart and damn it looks sharp. It was similar to watching Star Wars when it was re-released into the theaters. Just amazing how much sharper it looked on the big screen and blu-ray than what I was used to seeing over all these years on VHS and DVD.
jman19
Lifer
- Nov 3, 2000
- 11,225
- 664
- 126
If you are sick of Lucas and his garbage, then no.
If you don't give a crap as long as it is Star Wars, then sure why not...
Dr. Zaus
Lifer
- Oct 16, 2008
- 11,764
- 347
- 126
How about you buy this version and then download the HD version that's not stupid: for fee?
I can't see any moral, though there are clearly legal, problems with this.
Last edited:
mmntech
Lifer
- Sep 20, 2007
- 17,501
- 12
- 0
Can't tell if serious. :\
It's a bit like calling King Kong crap for it's hokey special effects. Yet it's still a landmark film 78 years later.
There's no reason the special editions and the theatrical cuts of Star Wars can't coexist. There's certainly a lot of demand from fans and the film community to give the originals the proper treatment. They'd make money. The only thing stopping that is George Lucas. He's being a strait up ass about it. Sure they're his films, but they're also cultural icons. They deserve preservation and release in their original form.
0roo0roo
No Lifer
- Sep 21, 2002
- 64,795
- 84
- 91
The originals are amazing. At the time especially.
However if I'm given a choice between watching the original and the re-mastered ones I'll pick the remastered ones each time. I know that they added a few things like the guys on the sand dunes instead of just the skeleton but for those that are younger you wouldn't even know the difference and the remastered version looks 10x better.
However if I'm given a choice between watching the original and the re-mastered ones I'll pick the remastered ones each time. I know that they added a few things like the guys on the sand dunes instead of just the skeleton but for those that are younger you wouldn't even know the difference and the remastered version looks 10x better.
Dr. Zaus
Lifer
- Oct 16, 2008
- 11,764
- 347
- 126
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 22K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products- Started by poke01
- Replies: 403
-
Facebook
Twitter