Was reading this site..
http://www.lhj.com/lhj/story.jhtml?storyid=/templatedata/ab/story/data/2044.xml&catref=cat40012&page=4
And it stated that:
Is it just me or is this complete crap? I thought the "height gene", as with most other genes either just comes from one parent or the other, and that it's not a combination of the two. Sure it says it's a "rough estimation", but it seems that they're suggesting that that's how the majority sways..but I figure how tall a kid grows up to is determined by chance of which gene he/she got from his/her parent in this aspect.
http://www.lhj.com/lhj/story.jhtml?storyid=/templatedata/ab/story/data/2044.xml&catref=cat40012&page=4
And it stated that:
For a rough estimation of adult height, take the average of Mom's and Dad's height. Then add two inches for a boy or subtract two inches for a girl. So if you're 5 feet 2 inches and your husband is 5 feet 10 inches, the average between you is 5 feet 6 inches. Therefore, your son will likely grow to be 5 feet 8 inches, your daughter, 5 feet 4 inches. Of course, genetics being what it is -- unpredictable -- this gauge is not ironclad. Your child may turn out to be taller than the taller parent or shorter than the shorter one.
Is it just me or is this complete crap? I thought the "height gene", as with most other genes either just comes from one parent or the other, and that it's not a combination of the two. Sure it says it's a "rough estimation", but it seems that they're suggesting that that's how the majority sways..but I figure how tall a kid grows up to is determined by chance of which gene he/she got from his/her parent in this aspect.