Joepublic2
Golden Member
- Jan 22, 2005
- 1,097
- 6
- 76
You people are so ignorant. No one has ever talked about using GM corn for the food supply. It is primarily used as feed for cattle. Also, fields that are planted with GM corn for this use are required to be a minimum distance from an non GM corn plots. Do you really think that all the corn you see from the highways when driving through the Midwest is grown for human consumption? Its not since you cannot grow human food supply corn that close to a roadway. Food supply corn is still grown under very stringent guidelines.
That website and study are so ridiculously biased I cannot believe you posted that with a straight face.
You do realize that GM corn is no different than corn which could occur naturally. These companies do nothing to the corn that couldn't occur naturally through breeding and a lot of generations. They simply insert the genes rather than waiting forever to either breed them in or go out and find a wild type with the gene of interest.
You anti GM folk are ignorant as fuck. (For the purposes of full disclosure, I have worked at two GM companies and am currently employed at one.)
Yeah, no way that food that food eats can effect me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioaccumulation
And we have been selectively breeding food forever, but that's not in any way the same as direct genetic insertion which I suspect you realize and are being disingenuous. You yourself just admitted that it is different from corn that occurs naturally without "waiting forever" for these genes to be incorporated through sexual integration.
And even if they are perfectly safe to eat (which remains to be proven; the burden of proof is on these companies and they have yet to satisfy it in much of the public's opinion), they could still send unforeseen, negative ripples through the greater ecosystem as seen in how some GM crops are negatively affecting pollinators, which is something nobody predicted.
