Generally, which is a better OCer, a 1700+ (Tbred-B DLT3C) or a 2400+?

Krk3561

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2002
3,242
0
0
Generally, which is a better OCer, a 1700+ (Tbred-B DLT3C) or a 2400+?

EDIT: I'm looking for ht one that OCs the highest w/ raising voltage.
 

ianching

Member
May 28, 2001
151
0
0
It depends on how you define "better".

The "DLT3C" 1700+ is a good overclocker since it has a higher % of overclock from the original speed.
2400+ is a better overclocker if you want the highest MHz out of the 2, 2400+ usually does 2.4GHz.

FYI, my DLT3C 1700+ (0308RPMW) does 2GHz with default voltage, 2.2GHz at 1.65V and 2.3GHz at 1.7V. Haven't try higher as it's hot in here.
 

MrSmithers

Senior member
Dec 31, 2002
500
0
0
If you want to know which chip overclocks more over its default voltage, you can't seem to go wrong right now with the 1700 cores, especially 0308-0310 and the DLT's, from what I have seen. I am building a friend a comp, and have a 0310UPMW from excaliber right now that does ~2 at default voltage. Haven't pushed it much because it isn't mine.

If you are talking about which one can attain the highest total clockspeeds, I would have to say I am not sure. Probably the 2400 by just a bit as far as average go, but I could be wrong. My opinion is once you hit over 2-2.2 or so with an AMD, you are gonna be rockin so hard you won't know the difference between 2.3 and 2.4.

Smithers
 

MrSmithers

Senior member
Dec 31, 2002
500
0
0
Lol, we posted same time almost same thing...must be a consensus or we are both just wrong....

Smithers