- Mar 18, 2007
- 11,959
- 157
- 106
Originally posted by: postmortemIA
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: postmortemIA
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Maybe I am wrong but found some interesting benchmarks as well. link
Amazing how little of a difference there is which the card with double the video ram. I think there a lot of different variables that effects how much video ram effects a certain video card.
I tired to play crysis at 1600x1200 and 1920x1200 with 8800GTS640 and 8800GT256.. even that 8800GTS640 was supposed to be slower, it was actually only one that is playable.
Were you running in DirectX 9 or DirextX 10? What were you detail settings at and did you use any AA or AF ?
DX10 - default high settings.
Same thing with Call of Juarez, 256MB + DX10 = far from enough
I fully agree with that. One thing benchmarks have not done compared DX9 to DX10. I always thought DX10 took a lot more than DX9. In my opinion 1 GB is maybe enough at 1680x1050 and above. The higher the resolution you go though with more AA and AF the more you will need. Crysis is a perfect example. Though some games streamline not having enough video ram and using system ram pretty well where you can not even notice it but not all. Though it is better if your a hardcore gamer to just have enough video ram or just about enough so you don't have this problem.
If you think I am crazy saying 1 GB is barely enough just look at GRID, Oblivion, Crysis (DX10), etc all with 4x AA and 16x AF. Better yet 8x AA.