I'm deffinatly getting one. An overclocked GF2 MX's performance compared to a GeForce DDR is like that of a Duron compared to an Athlon. All that for $120 is imposssible to pass up!
Why is everybody comparing a overclocked MX vs a nonoverclocked DDR? You might aswell say "why buy a GTS when a overclocked DDR is just as fast". You should compare them both overclocked or both at default speeds.
However you twist and turn it the GTS is faster than the DDR which is faster than the MX, but the best bang for your buck is IMO the MX (and if you´re content with 16-bit color and <1024 it´s really fast).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.