• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Geforce 2 gts vs Radeon Le

Well, to do this comparision, basically just compare a Radeon 64 vs. A GF2 GTS, which there are plenty of comparisions like that around. But the bottom line, is that a GF2 will have better frame rates at lower resoultions, but the higher you go, the higher performing the Radeon will be because of HyperZ. Oh and in terms of features, well A Radeon has better DVD playback I believe, but that's all I can think of.
 
But Athlon, if you compare the Radeon 64mb (spiced out version) vs. the GTS, it's an unfair battle. Really, the Radeon LE sucks unless you plan on OC'ing it to a full Radeon. The GTS vs. 64mb Radeon. Depends what you want, The GTS will get you good images with extremely high framerates. The Radeon will get you great images with average framerates.
I chose the GTS Pro ($140 at NewEGG), because I figured what good is having great imaging if your framerate is unbelievably slow?
-- mrcodedude
 
Geforce-2 will have better win2k support. radeon LE is a good card but I won't say it is the same as radeon 64..
 
Back
Top