• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Geekbench 6 released and calibrated against Core i7-12700

I

igor_kavinski

Lifer
Last edited:
I got these scores with my OC 13600K (5500+4200MHz):

geek6b.png

Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - Geekbench

Benchmark results for a Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z790 AORUS ELITE AX with an Intel Core i5-13600K processor.
browser.geekbench.com browser.geekbench.com


EDIT: When running it for the second time, the application crashed in the Clang part. Upped a voltage a bit and then I got a higher score above.
 
Last edited:
Sounds purpose designed to disadvantage homogeneous multi-core designs.
On the other hand the longer run time as result of larger data sets is good.
And finally they removed AES/XTS score. 🙂
 
Dammit, it crashed again! Running these various tasks may be good for quick testing of OC stability.

(I hope that the new version is not buggy itself)
 
The multi-threaded test appears to be lightly threaded by today's standards, outside of the Clang compile test. Many tests don't even hit 25% utilization across the 24 threads. Only the Clang test seems to load above 50%, at least for any significant length of time that I could see it while monitoring.
 
Hitman928 said:
Here's my 5900x with PPT lowered to ~120W (I don't remember exactly off the top of my head) and slight negative offsets with curve optimizer.

View attachment 76467

Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS ELITE - Geekbench

Benchmark results for a Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS ELITE with an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor.
browser.geekbench.com browser.geekbench.com
Click to expand...
Better score than my 5900X (at default PPT too) score of 2237/12242

ASUS System Product Name - Geekbench

Benchmark results for an ASUS System Product Name with an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor.
browser.geekbench.com browser.geekbench.com
 
igor_kavinski said:
Coz heavy multithreaded would favor AMD!

WOW. Are they being paid off by Intel?
Click to expand...
Lightly multithreaded loads favor AMD, because they have all cores large, fewer threads hit weaker E cores on Intel CPUs, but not that many of them to reap the full benefits of them.

And in spite of this 13600K at stock has 88% ST and 77% MT performance of the 7950X at half the price. Impressive value.
 
Kocicak said:
Ligtly multithreaded loads favor AMD, because they have all cores large, fewer threads hit weaker E cores on Intel CPUs, but not that many of them to reap the full benefits of them.

And in spite of this 13600K at stock has 88% ST and 77% MT performance of the 7950X at half the price. Impressive value.
Click to expand...
Compare it to this one..

1676399482552.png

ASUS System Product Name - Geekbench

Benchmark results for an ASUS System Product Name with an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X processor.
browser.geekbench.com browser.geekbench.com
 
Kocicak said:
Ligtly multithreaded loads favor AMD, because they have all cores large, fewer threads hit weaker E cores on Intel CPUs, but not that many of them to reap the full benefits of them.

And in spite of this 13600K at stock has 88% SST and 77% MT of the 7950X at half the price. Impressive value.
Click to expand...

This would only be true if Intel's CPUs had only a few P-cores, but they have 6+. From my (admittedly very brief) testing, the vast majority of MT tests only load 6 or less threads.

Edit: After another quick test where I upped my polling rate, I take back this statement somewhat. Most tests seem to use ~12 threads on my CPU with Clang using ~20. I didn't see many of them before because the higher load only shows up for less than a second, which was what my polling rate was set to. There are still a few that seem to only load 2, maybe 4 threads at most. This is still all just estimates with a higher polling rate though. An actual thread utilization measurement across the tests would be better. This is also just reported utilization, I don't know if the sub test performance actually scales or not.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top