• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

gcc 2.95 vs 3.02



<< GCC 3.0 is new and certainly has a number of bugs to fix. And it's stricter on syntax so it may choke on some older code. >>



When RH first used the 3.0 gcc some of the developers were angry because it was a development release and not a real release. I could be mis-remembering the crap flying around back then though.
 
Does anyone know about speed differences between code produced by the two? I'm hoping 3.x will give a little bit of a boost because my Linux desktop admittedly feels pretty slow (though I think it's a result of X11, slow KDE code and poorly optimized compiled code, but fixing out of the three can't hurt any). If I could get KDE 3.0 (supposed to be improved code-wise) compiled with GCC 3.0 and running on DirectFB . . . . man that would be paradise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top