If your grammar was correct, I could comprehend what you've written. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately), it's terrible and makes your ideas illegible.
Actually, while not perfect, my grammar is just fine. Everyone else understood what I said, as did you until it became convenient to try to blame me for not reading my post carefully. Also, you don't need a comma in your first sentence; it is unnecessary.
There is nothing "in general" about it, I could come out and say all Democrats in general are socialists but that doesn't mean they are "in general".
Any libertarian who considers themselves anarchists or who have those views can say they are libertarian all they want.
The whole anarchism bit is a red herring. I never once said anything about complete abolition of the government. However, it is fair to say that the libertarian movement
in general is in favor of deregulation of the market to a large degree. It is likewise fair to say that libertarians, in general, favor cutting regulatory agencies. For example, let's go to the Libertarian Party websites.
The FDA:
http://www.lp.org/issues/healthcare
We should replace harmful government agencies like the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) with more agile, free-market alternatives.
OSHA
http://kevincraig.us/www.lp.org/issues/platform/occusafe.html
Transitional Action: We call for the repeal of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
The SEC:
http://www.dehnbase.org/lpus/library/platform/faci.html
We call for the abolition of all regulation of financial and capital markets -- specifically, the abolition of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
-
I can go on but the point is well established, cutting government oversight isn't something a few libertarians believe in, it is, in general, what libertarians believe. It is an official part of their platform. That you are actually disputing this is baffling.