For 2016, the business leaders (may include Big Labor) have a chance to reduce Dr. Paul's views as being accepted as correct and mainstream. If Dr. Paul could've become President in 2013, then the business leaders wouldn't have been able to plan things out as well in part because they would've been more alike in 2013 than they could be in 2017.
They have a chance to make Gary Johnson as well. Johnson would maybe be a better fit than Paul because Johnson is more of an insider (i.e., he's more of a beltwayarian than he is a libertarian), he's a tool like me (and he's a pothead like I was), and he's not an Austrian (he's more of a chicagoan). Like me, Johnson lacks Dr. Paul's self control because Johnson ran on an anti-crime platform yet he's a libertarian. Maybe he's a lifestyle libertarian, but he's really not a libertarian because he has very limited respect for the NAP and because he approached Dr. Paul who ignored him for various reasons. I'll admit that I don't handle change that well, that I'm controlled at times, because I'm deceptive at other times... that means I may not be a libertarian myself as I think Dr. Block would call me a statist... I would give him gas, and/or a stroke, a heart attack even though I don't ever want to do any of those things to that great good man.
They also have a chance to pit Johnson and at least one Dr. Paul against each other.
All of that said, who do you think will have more power between the Chicagoan Faction and the Austrian Faction/Ron Paul faction? Some form of libertarianism, regardless of how small it may be, will have gained enough popularity
They aren't going to pick Dr. Rand Paul lest they want to continue the Republic longer like their forefather did with Warren G Harding back in the day (Wilson created a key to crashing the Republic, Harding really was used to kick the can down the road... even FDR couldn't crash the U.S. quasi-Imperial Republic immediately). Lincoln, OTOH, almost immediately lead to the death of the U.S. Federal Republic with the 14th Amendment which abolished the States' rights to determine who was a citizen, the protection of their former Citizens, their future citizens-->Subjects, and any possible chances the people have had to not be complicit in world empire. Wilson's heirs, the neocons (like FDR, George W Bush, and the rest of the Rockefeller faction of the Republican Party), made it the U.S. Imperial Republic, I guess.
I apologize for the wall of text, or if anyone felt like their IQ went down, or if it caused anyone a change in their testosterone level, or if they spittled on something valuable. However, I can't help anything I do.
They have a chance to make Gary Johnson as well. Johnson would maybe be a better fit than Paul because Johnson is more of an insider (i.e., he's more of a beltwayarian than he is a libertarian), he's a tool like me (and he's a pothead like I was), and he's not an Austrian (he's more of a chicagoan). Like me, Johnson lacks Dr. Paul's self control because Johnson ran on an anti-crime platform yet he's a libertarian. Maybe he's a lifestyle libertarian, but he's really not a libertarian because he has very limited respect for the NAP and because he approached Dr. Paul who ignored him for various reasons. I'll admit that I don't handle change that well, that I'm controlled at times, because I'm deceptive at other times... that means I may not be a libertarian myself as I think Dr. Block would call me a statist... I would give him gas, and/or a stroke, a heart attack even though I don't ever want to do any of those things to that great good man.
They also have a chance to pit Johnson and at least one Dr. Paul against each other.
All of that said, who do you think will have more power between the Chicagoan Faction and the Austrian Faction/Ron Paul faction? Some form of libertarianism, regardless of how small it may be, will have gained enough popularity
They aren't going to pick Dr. Rand Paul lest they want to continue the Republic longer like their forefather did with Warren G Harding back in the day (Wilson created a key to crashing the Republic, Harding really was used to kick the can down the road... even FDR couldn't crash the U.S. quasi-Imperial Republic immediately). Lincoln, OTOH, almost immediately lead to the death of the U.S. Federal Republic with the 14th Amendment which abolished the States' rights to determine who was a citizen, the protection of their former Citizens, their future citizens-->Subjects, and any possible chances the people have had to not be complicit in world empire. Wilson's heirs, the neocons (like FDR, George W Bush, and the rest of the Rockefeller faction of the Republican Party), made it the U.S. Imperial Republic, I guess.
I apologize for the wall of text, or if anyone felt like their IQ went down, or if it caused anyone a change in their testosterone level, or if they spittled on something valuable. However, I can't help anything I do.
Facebook
Twitter