Okay, this statement has me a little concerned:
I've been looking at performance benchmarks for various hardware components for some time now, and most of the measurements involving games measure at 1920x1200 (I know this because I'm running 1080p at the moment, and frequently use this score out of the several provided to guestimate how it would theoretically run for me, give or take a little).
So now I'm planning to go with a 24" screen, and I'm a little confused -- is it a crapshoot whether or not the game you buy will run at 1920x1200? Is this resolution being dropped in favor of 1080p, and for some games you're going to have either black bars above and below -- or a stretched screen -- if 1920x1200 isn't supported?
(Sorry if this is a dumb question -- I went from 4:3 to 1080p, and have never owned a screen at this resolution before...)
the running of a game in 16:9 res on a 16:10 claim with black bars doesn't always pan out. I played around with several 16:10 monitors before deciding to go 16:9. some games would add black bars while others would just stretch and look slightly distorted. my main concern is gaming so I certainly see 16:10 as being a better overall option for many people though.
I've been looking at performance benchmarks for various hardware components for some time now, and most of the measurements involving games measure at 1920x1200 (I know this because I'm running 1080p at the moment, and frequently use this score out of the several provided to guestimate how it would theoretically run for me, give or take a little).
So now I'm planning to go with a 24" screen, and I'm a little confused -- is it a crapshoot whether or not the game you buy will run at 1920x1200? Is this resolution being dropped in favor of 1080p, and for some games you're going to have either black bars above and below -- or a stretched screen -- if 1920x1200 isn't supported?
(Sorry if this is a dumb question -- I went from 4:3 to 1080p, and have never owned a screen at this resolution before...)