- Jul 3, 2000
- 2,323
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Ike0069
That's a very nice review, in spite of any mistakes it has.
Still looks like the best bang for $$ is the 7800GT. I also like the fact that they throw in a 6800GS just give a little more perspective.
Originally posted by: Zstream
Originally posted by: Ike0069
That's a very nice review, in spite of any mistakes it has.
Still looks like the best bang for $$ is the 7800GT. I also like the fact that they throw in a 6800GS just give a little more perspective.
How is it a nice review? There are tons of mistakes on it which are crucial. I guess to a average idiot it must be a good review.
Originally posted by: Griswold
Wow at the number of typos in that article. And where can I buy this 7800GHz 512MB thing they mention at the bottom of the last page?![]()
Originally posted by: Griswold
Wow at the number of typos in that article. And where can I buy this 7800GHz 512MB thing they mention at the bottom of the last page?![]()
Originally posted by: Steelski
i love the fact that "lower times mean better performance" in HL2 Lost coast
Originally posted by: CKXP
Originally posted by: Steelski
i love the fact that "lower times mean better performance" in HL2 Lost coast
:laugh:also in FEAR, if lower means better, then my 6800nu kills the 512GTX and 1800XT...:Q