gamegpuParagon GPU Benchmarks

[csbin]

http://gamegpu.com/mmorpg-/-о...игры/paragon-test-gpu

 

[csbin]

Epic Games also released a graph that shows exactly what kind of FPS to expect with certain GPUs. You can have a look at the graph and at the complete list of requirements below.

 

[thesmokingman]

Epic Games also released a graph that shows exactly what kind of FPS to expect with certain GPUs. You can have a look at the graph and at the complete list of requirements below.

At least they're upfront about it. D:

 

[S.H.O.D.A.N.]

Those numbers make no sense whatsoever. Fury - 61, 390 - 68. 980 - 85, TX 75.

 

[therealnickdanger]

Those numbers make no sense whatsoever. Fury - 61, 390 - 68. 980 - 85, TX 75.

The way it's meant to be played.

 

[VulgarDisplay]

Those numbers make no sense whatsoever. Fury - 61, 390 - 68. 980 - 85, TX 75.

Different settings. Either way it is 100% meant to paint a picture, and not give an accurate representation.

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

 

[S.H.O.D.A.N.]

Okay, AMD results come from different setting, but NVidia ones do not.

 

[Kenmitch]

Okay, AMD results come from different setting, but NVidia ones do not.

Not sure how or why you twisted it that way.

Additionally, we have provided a list of tested graphic cards below. This data is pulled from current Online Tests and should provide a guideline for common graphics cards.

https://www.epicgames.com/paragon/faq

Results may be similar. Actual end user configurations are unknown so it's pretty much a your mileage may very thing.

 

[S.H.O.D.A.N.]

I didn't twist anything. It's right there in the second post.

Epic settings, 980 average fps 85, TX average fps 75.

If they really pulled those numbers from online testing with no fixed specs, they're essentially meaningless.

 

[Stuka87]

There is already a few post on all of this..

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2467847

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2467452

 

[Bacon1]

Gameplay is decent, didn't notice any issues running it @ 2560x1600 on my 290, not sure what settings were but most if not all on (Except AA and any motion blur). Haven't played for a few weeks and didn't do any benchmarking was just playing. Those are some funky official numbers, though, 980 is 2 fps shy of 980 TI and way higher than Titan X? Fury / 390 way under what they should be... seems like they've only optimized for 970 and 980s everything else is way out of wack compared to them.

 

[airfathaaaaa]

why did he opened 2 threads for the same thing lol

also nothing really have changed on this game

 

[Actaeon]

That 780 Ti doing much better than we've seen recently at 1440p, though it looks like the lack of VRAM is causing it to choke at 4K. Other 4GB cards look a bit memory starved as well at 4K, but not nearly as bad as the 3.5GB and 3GB cards.

Lack of SLI support is a bit of a disappointment.