• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

gamegpuHomefront The Revolution Benchmarks

csbin

Senior member
http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/homefront-the-revolution-test-gpu

medish.jpg



medish.jpg


medish.jpg


medish.jpg
 
Maybe they couldn't be bothered to play it anymore, gameplay reviews are all super bad
whenever a game comes they never use any high end amd card its not only about this one while clearly they have amd cards
(not to mention that its not really that hard to sell that 290x and get a 390 or a x to be more relevant..)
 
whenever a game comes they never use any high end amd card its not only about this one while clearly they have amd cards
(not to mention that its not really that hard to sell that 290x and get a 390 or a x to be more relevant..)

Yeah I know I was just kidding ;D

Its sad to see people still using reference 290(x) in reviews... like come on :\
 
Yeah I know I was just kidding ;D

Its sad to see people still using reference 290(x) in reviews... like come on :\

Well, R9 290X has almost the same performance as R9 390. So we at least know the performance of R9 390 from Gamegpu.ru reviews.

But they used the Fury for some game reviews last month or so. They really need new cards, including Pascal and soon to be released Polaris.
 
Well, R9 290X has almost the same performance as R9 390. So we at least know the performance of R9 390 from Gamegpu.ru reviews.

But they used the Fury for some game reviews last month or so. They really need new cards, including Pascal and soon to be released Polaris.

Considering the 290X is a bit aheag of the 980 it wouldn't look too good if the 390X was used. The margin would start making people think the 390X was a better solution.
 
Considering the 290X is a bit aheag of the 980 it wouldn't look too good if the 390X was used. The margin would start making people think the 390X was a better solution.

Definitely, they should had both 390 and 390X in 2016 game reviews, along with all 3 Furys.

Also more CPUs 😉
 
Definitely, they should had both 390 and 390X in 2016 game reviews, along with all 3 Furys.

Also more CPUs 😉

Maybe AMD should realize that a few dozen cards are real cheap advertising. Tell them they will give them new 390/X for returning their 290/X. Get those reference 290's the hell out of reviews too.
 
Maybe AMD should realize that a few dozen cards are real cheap advertising. Tell them they will give them new 390/X for returning their 290/X. Get those reference 290's the hell out of reviews too.

Surely those are not ref 290s? At this point it would be intentional misinformation to use those cards in reviews.
 
Not impressive by any means, if Crytek had developed it I am certain it would have scaled much better.
 
Back
Top