gamegpuCall of Duty Black Ops III Beta CPU Benchmark

[csbin]

http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/call-of-duty-black-ops-iii-beta-test-gpu.html

 

[YBS1]

This is unpossible?!? We all know games can't use more than four cores.

 

[monstercameron]

It's treyarc, enough said.

 

[rancherlee]

It's treyarc, enough said.

Amen, Starting with World At War, they have made the best COD games IMO. Nice to see the "cheap" 8350 right around a fast i5.

 

[Arachnotronic]

Amen, Starting with World At War, they have made the best COD games IMO. Nice to see the "cheap" 8350 right around a fast i5.

I wasn't a fan of World at War, but Black Ops and Black Ops II were excellent.

 

[monstercameron]

I wasn't a fan of World at War, but Black Ops and Black Ops II were excellent.

Especially compared to ghost.

 

[Yuriman]

Amen, Starting with World At War, they have made the best COD games IMO. Nice to see the "cheap" 8350 right around a fast i5.

Yep. Unfortunately, just matching an i5 in a best-case scenario only looks good because we're used to seeing the FX chips slaughtered, and as many new games as not are coming out where the FX chips don't hang. 2500K owners have a lot more basis for smugness.

Every new game that comes out and runs well on an FX chip is good news for everyone, though.

 

[Arachnotronic]

Especially compared to ghost.

Yeah. I liked Ghosts and all, but Black Ops 2 was on a different level.

 

[guskline]

I'm playing the beta. Played it earlier this morning before work. I'll try to let you know the fps on both of my rigs below when I get a chance (tonight after work). Those min fps are so high on all of the cpus it sure doesn't look like it will take a powerful cpu to run it. Remember it is a beta until 8-31.

BTW, the game is fun. I'm a lousy gamer but nonetheless it's fun AND Prophet is BACK!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[LTC8K6]

Well, the 8350 is running much faster than that i5, so a 4690 at 3.5 probably handily defeats the 4.0 8350. Then we look down to the 6300 vs i3 at the same base clock, and we have to shake our heads again, as the i3 is in the lead.

The one makes it look like cores really matter, then the other makes it look like they don't.

 

[Erenhardt]

Every new game that comes out and runs well on an FX chip is good news for everyone, though.

Not for those with pentiums anniversary editions.

Well, the 8350 is running much faster than that i5, so a 4690 at 3.5 probably handily defeats the 4.0 8350. Then we look down to the 6300 vs i3 at the same base clock, and we have to shake our heads again, as the i3 is in the lead.

The one makes it look like cores really matter, then the other makes it look like they don't.

6300 is the lowest clocked fx cpu out there. This game, while using a lot of cores (Kudos) is still running single-threaded DX11 api.
It is worth nothing that fx6300 overclocks like a champ (20%+) on cheapest motherboards.
This puts it right where regular low i5 is.
And we are talking <$100 CPU+mobo here

 

[monstercameron]

I'm playing the beta. Played it earlier this morning before work. I'll try to let you know the fps on both of my rigs below when I get a chance (tonight after work). Those min fps are so high on all of the cpus it sure doesn't look like it will take a powerful cpu to run it. Remember it is a beta until 8-31.

BTW, the game is fun. I'm a lousy gamer but nonetheless it's fun AND Prophet is BACK!!!!!!!!!!!

Wait is this crysis?

 

[LTC8K6]

Not for those with pentiums anniversary editions.



6300 is the lowest clocked fx cpu out there. This game, while using a lot of cores (Kudos) is still running single-threaded DX11 api.
It is worth nothing that fx6300 overclocks like a champ (20%+) on cheapest motherboards.
This puts it right where regular low i5 is.
And we are talking <$100 CPU+mobo here

We can overclock the i5 chips too. Including the previous gen ones.

I have an overclocked FX-6300 system, btw.

 

[LTC8K6]

Not for those with pentiums anniversary editions.



6300 is the lowest clocked fx cpu out there. This game, while using a lot of cores (Kudos) is still running single-threaded DX11 api.
It is worth nothing that fx6300 overclocks like a champ (20%+) on cheapest motherboards.
This puts it right where regular low i5 is.
And we are talking <$100 CPU+mobo here

We can overclock the i5 chips too. Including the previous gen ones.

Overclocking the i5's probably moves them ahead of an overclocked 8350.

I have an overclocked FX-6300 system, btw.

 

[TeknoBug]

CoD doesn't seem to be taking advantage of multi cores.

 

[monstercameron]

CoD doesn't seem to be taking advantage of multi cores.

It does scale me the moar coars. So it does take advantage of it.

 

[YBS1]

CoD doesn't seem to be taking advantage of multi cores.

Well considering the 4770k has a significant clock speed advantage and the 5960 still destroys it, it's either taking advantage of the extra cores or the large cache.

 

[ShintaiDK]

Its very easy, just run the benchmark on a 5675C

 

[TeknoBug]

Well considering the 4770k has a significant clock speed advantage and the 5960 still destroys it, it's either taking advantage of the extra cores or the large cache.

BO3 seems to have a "sweet spot" with 2 cores and 4 cores on certain CPU's.

 

[readers]

We need 6700k and 4790k here.

 

[YBS1]

Uh...of course load percentage is higher, less cores are having to work harder. Meanwhile the 5960 is almost certainly GPU constrained.

 

[Erenhardt]

We can overclock the i5 chips too. Including the previous gen ones.

Overclocking the i5's probably moves them ahead of an overclocked 8350.

I have an overclocked FX-6300 system, btw.

Good luck overclocking i5-4440. You are not comparing fx6300 to top of the line i5 K series, right?
Ofcourse it just one game, but rencetly more and more games utilize 6 cores somewhat efficiently (console effect?) and fx6300 is climing the ladder for the abyss.

I recently jumped from fx6300 to fx 8300 because the price was right and dx12 hype. Sadly my CPU monitoring OSD shows 2 threads are idle in most games...

 

[LTC8K6]

Good luck overclocking i5-4440. You are not comparing fx6300 to top of the line i5 K series, right?
Ofcourse it just one game, but rencetly more and more games utilize 6 cores somewhat efficiently (console effect?) and fx6300 is climing the ladder for the abyss.

I recently jumped from fx6300 to fx 8300 because the price was right and dx12 hype. Sadly my CPU monitoring OSD shows 2 threads are idle in most games...

It's a 4670K and a 2500K in the chart...both right around the 8350. Both of which would probably pass the 8350 if we decided to overclock all three and see who won.

 

[cmdrdredd]

Well considering the 4770k has a significant clock speed advantage and the 5960 still destroys it, it's either taking advantage of the extra cores or the large cache.

I find it funny you use the term destroy when you're already above 150fps minumums. Who gives a flying turd at that point?

 

[SPBHM]

i3 2100 (3.1GHz sandy bridge dual core) still beating some 6 cores stuff, what a champion.

in any case, all the framerates look high, perhaps the game is easy on the CPU or they didn't choose the test scene well enough?

in any case, the game seems to scale a little better with over 4c than the previous COD

fx 4300 was faster than the 8150, now the 8150 is a good bit faster for example