[GameGPU]Sniper Ghost Warrior 3

[PontiacGTX]

Spoiler: GPU Benchmarks

Spoiler: 1080

Spoiler: 1440

Spoiler: 2160

Spoiler: VRAM

Spoiler: CPU Benchmark

Spoiler: CPU Benchmark

Spoiler: RAM

Source​

 

[PontiacGTX]

it seems strange that 480 8GB could be R9 290x at 4k but the Fury is Still ahead with 4GB(while games uses 4.3GB)

 

[dogen1]

it seems strange that 480 8GB could be R9 290x at 4k but the Fury is Still ahead with 4GB(while games uses 4.3GB)

Just because the game uses 4.3GB doesn't mean it actually needs that much.

 

[PontiacGTX]

Just because the game uses 4.3GB doesn't mean it actually needs that much.

it seems it does because 290x is underperforming meanwhile Fury-Nano arent

 

[dogen1]

it seems it does because 290x is underperforming meanwhile Fury-Nano arent

That doesn't make sense. Both of those cards have the same amount of vram.

And a 290x 4GB is performing the same as a 480 with 8GB.

 

[psolord]

The 1800X is first hey? Pretty good. I wish they could add smaller Ryzen siblings.

Also the 2500k is giving a very good smacking to the 8350. 85fps vs 66fps. So much for the "press losing the plot". meh...

 

[SlowSpyder]

it seems strange that 480 8GB could be R9 290x at 4k but the Fury is Still ahead with 4GB(while games uses 4.3GB)

I imagine developers use the vram if its there to store data that isn't necessarily needed 'now'.

Also the 2500k is giving a very good smacking to the 8350. 85fps vs 66fps. So much for the "press losing the plot". meh...

The i3's don't do bad in this game either, I doubt it needs a ton of cores to run well. If that is the case, then that's a really good showing by the 1800X.

 

[IllogicalGlory]

Also the 2500k is giving a very good smacking to the 8350. 85fps vs 66fps. So much for the "press losing the plot". meh...

Yeah, it's doing pretty badly in this game. That's always been the problem with the BD derivatives. They can manage decent performance on average, but choke in some games.

This one result doesn't invalidate that particular section of the video though. Honestly it's the only part that I thought was decent.

Great results on the 1800X though. Hope we see more of this down the line.

 

[Bacon1]

This game isn't core heavy at all which is why. I mean the core i3 2100 is doing well which shows its heavily single core bound. They aren't OCing any of the CPUs which is why the 1800x is at top, in the testing they used an OC'd 5960x @ 4.6 which gave 136 fps or 30% gain from 3.0 -> 4.6 ghz

Pretty nuts to see Fury X outpacing SLI 980 Ti though and so close to the 1080.

 

[Paratus]

This game isn't core heavy at all which is why. I mean the core i3 2100 is doing well which shows its heavily single core bound. They aren't OCing any of the CPUs which is why the 1800x is at top, in the testing they used an OC'd 5960x @ 4.6 which gave 136 fps or 30% gain from 3.0 -> 4.6 ghz

Pretty nuts to see Fury X outpacing SLI 980 Ti though and so close to the 1080.

I'm in shock the 280X is basically on par with the 970 at 1080P.

 

[Borealis7]

title should really be revised to include BETA indication, you got me thinking the game was released already!
i really liked the first 2 games since i love sniper action as opposed to "run & gun" action, but my video card isn't strong enough for this one and i'm still waiting for Vega before upgrading my GPU.
release the damn cards already!

 

[Bacon1]

title should really be revised to include BETA indication, you got me thinking the game was released already!

The game is out, it came out on the 24th according to Steam

https://www.purepc.pl/karty_graficz...ost_warrior_3_celny_strzal_czy_pudlo?page=0,7