- Sep 5, 2003
- 19,458
- 765
- 126
GameGPU used SSAO and SMAA_T2X. I didn't see any reference to any GameWorks features in their review. Feel free to add any other reviews to this thread if you find them (PCgameshardware, TechSpot, Computerbase, etc.). That means the graphs below are with GWs features off.
For those who keep ripping AMD's FX series and hyping up i3s since forever, have fun with that idea. FX9590 > i5 4670/i7 2600K.
My personal opinion - this game is very poorly optimized on the GPU side for its level of mediocre graphics. Requiring an overclocked 780 or a 290/Titan to hit 60 fps @ 1080P for console level graphics. My opinion = Mad Max, made on the same Avalanche Engine 3.0 looks and runs better.
This is with everything maxed out, including tessellated water.
Source Article
No SLI/CF support for now.
As always, feel free to link other review sites/graphs in this thread for a more diverse comparison.



For those who keep ripping AMD's FX series and hyping up i3s since forever, have fun with that idea. FX9590 > i5 4670/i7 2600K.

My personal opinion - this game is very poorly optimized on the GPU side for its level of mediocre graphics. Requiring an overclocked 780 or a 290/Titan to hit 60 fps @ 1080P for console level graphics. My opinion = Mad Max, made on the same Avalanche Engine 3.0 looks and runs better.
This is with everything maxed out, including tessellated water.






Source Article
No SLI/CF support for now.
As always, feel free to link other review sites/graphs in this thread for a more diverse comparison.
Last edited: