• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Game sequels that either impressed or disappointed. Please list them and why.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Most disappointing, although not a RTS: Modern Warfare 2.

Also disappointing, KOTOR2 for the ending and the lack of KOTOR3 to finish the story.

Also really terrible, more of an expansion pack than a sequel: Red Alert 3 Uprising.
 
MoO 2 was great and generally an improvement over the original; never tried the 3rd since EVERYONE said it sucked. You can get it off of Abandonia, and it runs fine with DOSBox.

Red Alert 2 was also pretty good, 3 was a sell-out failure. Generals has absolutely nothing to do with Command and Conquer, but (with the expansion) was a pretty good game in its own right.

I like SupCom: Forged Alliance a lot, and it does help that it still has an active modding community, but SupCom 2 was also a sell-out failure that shares nothing with its predecessor.

Far Cry 2 has nothing to do with Far Cry, but I like it for what it is even if it's not a game you can sit down and play straight through (has a few infuriating flaws).

L4D2 is a solid improvement over the original. The only thing I really don't like about it is that double pistols really suck. A Magnum is always better and I would rather each loadout have its advantages and disadvantages (like they did with the main weapons). The melee weapons are all samey too, but if all 10 or so of them were different that might be too much.

Mercenaries was fun, but Mercs 2 was just stupid. It's too bad that the original is practically unplayable on 360 (freezes all the time), not that that would matter to you if you're PC-only.

Halo 3 was the game Halo 2 was meant to be, and (given my experience with the beta) I'd say Reach will also be good. The abilities, different health system, new game types, reworked weapons and balancing, and improved map editor should bring some freshness to the tired franchise. Oh, and don't buy ODST at full price, it's just a map pack and short campaign with a game mode you'll soon get tired of.

Mass Effect 2 fixed almost everything that was wrong with the first, and brought a totally different style of gameplay too. I liked it; the exact same mechanics as the first game would have been dull.
 
L4D2 is a solid improvement over the original. The only thing I really don't like about it is that double pistols really suck. A Magnum is always better and I would rather each loadout have its advantages and disadvantages (like they did with the main weapons). The melee weapons are all samey too, but if all 10 or so of them were different that might be too much.

Eh I dont know a lot of L4D2 just seems like added on stuff that really didnt make the game better. I will admit some of the new game modes were neat but I felt the original was still better that could be just my opinion though.
 
Dungeon Siege 2. Nice game but the gameplay is worst then first one. graphic engine i guess is the same, character evolution is very odd.
 
Eh I dont know a lot of L4D2 just seems like added on stuff that really didnt make the game better. I will admit some of the new game modes were neat but I felt the original was still better that could be just my opinion though.

Considering it's $30 right now and it has been sold for as little as $10 I'd say it's well worth the money.

I agree, there was nothing revolutionary about the second, but it was a general fleshing out and improvement of the original.
 
unreal tournament 3 - fuck this game, seriously damn it all to hell. had my hopes so high on this being the next epic arena shooter only for it to fall flat on its face and leave me disappointed and never playing another FPS again.


age of empires 3 - multiplayer was terrible, only noobs who played "30 minutes no rush" games
 
I agree with most everything here.

-- Good sequels --
Elvira 2
Baldurs Gate 2
Doom 2
Moo 2
UT 2003/4
Supreme Commander 1 (as an indirect sequel to TA)
Mechwarrior 4 (yeah, I said it, wanna fight?)
Elder Scrolls 3
KOTOR 2, even though its kind of a mess.
Heroes of Might and Magic 3
Disciples 2.
Imperium Galactica 2.
Alien Vs Predator 2.
No One Lives Forever 2.
Homeworld 2 (screw you guys, I loved it!!)
Most of the Might & Magics.


-- BAD sequels --
Neverwinter Nights or Dragon Age, whichever you consider to be the sequel to BG2.
Moo3. Worst sequel ever since it actually came out.
Duke Nukem Forever. Worst sequel that never came out.
Max Payne 3. WTF?
UT 3. Added nothing to the genre except consolitis.
Far Cry 2. Ditto.
Heroes 4 and 5.
Disciples 3.
Age of Empires 3, Empire Earth 3. Utterly sad attempts to milk the franchise.
Elder Scrolls 4.
KOTOR 3. Second-worst game that never came out.
Fallout 3.
Migh & Magic 9.
Most of the C&C's from Windows 98 on.
Doom 3.
Sim City 4.
Starcraft 2, because it wasnt a sequel, just a remake in 3D. And it cost 60 bucks. And the good campaign wasnt enough to make up for that because most of the game play is in skirmish and Bnet.
Deus Ex 2.
Red Faction 3. Lets continue to destroy good franchises by forcing the over used and under utilized sandbox genre on them.


-- Games most in need of a sequel --
Septerra Core
Anacronox
Act of War
Titan Quest
Dungeon Keeper
KOTOR
Homeworld
Braid
No One Lives Forever
 
Good:
TIE Fighter
Quake 2
Mass Effect 2
Gears of War 2 (single-player, at least)
FFIX
Command & Conquer 3

BAD:
KOTOR 2
Colony Wars: Vengeance
Tomb Raider 2
FFVIII
Warcraft III
Diablo II
Far Cry 2

WTF:
Any MGS after 1
 
For me it's Diablo II

I spent countless hours (adding up to years) on Diablo 1 single player. By the time I realized there was even an online component to it, I already moved on to Diablo II. Part of me is glad they didn't have a way to count the time you spent on that game. Even more immersive than 1 was, more characters to choose from, and they got rid of that snot Wert 😉

I was so glad when I found out him and his godly rags of the whale that he kept offering me were dead.
 
I haven't seen Spellforce 2 or Sacred 2 mentioned yet.

Spellforce 2 just took a rich, complex game and dumbed it down to the point where it sucked.

Sacred 2 was uninspired and full of bugs and performance issues.

I liked Dragon Age, but from the sounds of it, I can probably add DA2 preemptively to the "bad sequels" list.

Good game series that I really liked were the Warlords series of TBS, and the Warlords Battlecry series of RTS games, although W4 and WBC3 stumbled a bit.
 
I haven't seen Spellforce 2 or Sacred 2 mentioned yet.

Spellforce 2 just took a rich, complex game and dumbed it down to the point where it sucked.

Sacred 2 was uninspired and full of bugs and performance issues.

Cannot agree here.

I found Spellforce 2 to be a superior game, however I played 2 before 1 so that might make a bit of a difference.

Sacred 1 was full of bugs and rather poor itself so to accuse Sacred 2 of such issues seems strange.
 
how old are you?

the only non MMO ive spent more time playing then MOO2 is Starcraft. Game was great. really a shame moo3 sucked so bad

I am REALLY old and never heard of it either. However, I didnt really get into PC gaming until around 2000 when I started playing with my grandson, who now can kick my butt in just about any game except maybe Dragon Age or KOTOR. (I am better at pausable combat LOL)
 
I am REALLY old and never heard of it either. However, I didnt really get into PC gaming until around 2000 when I started playing with my grandson, who now can kick my butt in just about any game except maybe Dragon Age or KOTOR. (I am better at pausable combat LOL)

News flash for all noobs:

If you started gaming in 2000 you missed out on MOST of the good stuff.
 
News flash for all noobs:

If you started gaming in 2000 you missed out on MOST of the good stuff.


The guys at our local car show say the same thing about their 60's muscle cars. Truth is, everybodys right. I like alot of pc games that came out in the 90's but honestly, who can go back to those graphics? um, not me... Those games are better left as a memory cause going back will ruin them for you
 
The guys at our local car show say the same thing about their 60's muscle cars. Truth is, everybodys right. I like alot of pc games that came out in the 90's but honestly, who can go back to those graphics? um, not me... Those games are better left as a memory cause going back will ruin them for you

Wrong.
Fail.

But if I argue I will end up getting banned again.
 
And in case I forgot, World In Conflict REALLY needs a damn sequel.

God damn that game is so freakin sweat I may just shoot my load thinking about it.
 
Back
Top