Gallup poll: Reagan greatest president ever

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IBMer

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,137
0
76
When will you ignorant fools ever understand that the president does not control spending levels? The president can ask for whatever he wants, but congress controls the purse. Democrats held congress during Reagan's presidency, if you want to blame someone for deficit spending, blame them.

What a president can do is submit his proposed budget, and when his proposed budget is as much or more than the one actually passed, this kind of arguement really holds no water. But of course you just want to ignore that and blame spending on the democrats.
 

Carmen813

Diamond Member
May 18, 2007
3,189
0
76
Indeed, JPII played a major role in what happened, and he deserves credit for it, just like Reagan deserves credit for his part.



A president is a lot like a coach on a football team. Often a coach can turn things around without actually changing the players on the team. Instead, he sets the tone and inspires the players to do better. That's what Reagan did, he gave the country confidence and inspired everyone to do better. You can all that smoke all you like, but the effects of that smoke can be very real, just like the effects of a placebo can be very real for the patient even if the medicine itself is BS.

How's that hopey changy stuff workin for ya?

Couldn't resist. :)
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
What a president can do is submit his proposed budget, and when his proposed budget is as much or more than the one actually passed, this kind of arguement really holds no water. But of course you just want to ignore that and blame spending on the democrats.

He can submit a proposed budget, but congress decides. Ultimately they are in charge of the spending. Period. The president can certainly have an impact, but you have to blame congress first.
 

IBMer

Golden Member
Jul 7, 2000
1,137
0
76
He can submit a proposed budget, but congress decides. Ultimately they are in charge of the spending. Period. The president can certainly have an impact, but you have to blame congress first.

So what you are saying that even though Regan submitted a budget with greater spending than the one actually passed, it was actually just the democrats fault and Regan was still fiscally responsible. Right...
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
So what you are saying that even though Regan submitted a budget with greater spending than the one actually passed, it was actually just the democrats fault and Regan was still fiscally responsible. Right...

Nope, Reagan was not fiscally responsible, but congress bears the blame since they control spending. That's how it was set up in the constitution.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Nope, Reagan was not fiscally responsible, but congress bears the blame since they control spending. That's how it was set up in the constitution.
This ignores that the President could veto the budget if he doesn't like it. Then its up to Congress to override his veto or come up with fixes that would be acceptable to the President or be able to override a second veto.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
This ignores that the President could veto the budget if he doesn't like it. Then its up to Congress to override his veto or come up with fixes that would be acceptable to the President or be able to override a second veto.

That is still within the purview of congress. The fact that the president can have an impact (or can veto it) doesn't absolve congress from the responsibility it has under the constitution to control the $$$.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,635
3,507
136
That's what Reagan did, he gave the country confidence and inspired everyone to do better. You can all that smoke all you like, but the effects of that smoke can be very real, just like the effects of a placebo can be very real for the patient even if the medicine itself is BS.

Well, at least we both agree Reagan was BS.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
If Clinton was so evil, how come GOP impeached him over a blowjob and not this? I guess all these problems didn't even rise to the level of importance of covering up oral sex as, so not much to see here.
Nothing in what I posted was a high crime or even a misdemeanor, nor was any of it beyond Clinton's authority. Although it had terrible results for our country, there is nothing remotely impeachable here.

On the other hand, perjury and suborning perjury are both felonies, and imminently impeachable. For that matter, simply having sex with someone in his chain of command is a crime, and technically impeachable. For some reason lefties seem to have great problems distinguishing between things they very much dislike and things that are criminal, as witnessed by your hatred of Bush. Notice that I did not call for Clinton's impeachment, nor his prosecution or imprisonment, nor his execution. While I very much hate what he did (perhaps unwittingly) to my country and to the free world, that does not make it criminal.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
Not to mention cutting and running, tripling the deficit, raising taxes 11 times, etc. And you guys hate Obama?
 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
ROFL! Ronnie Raygun is the worst president of the modern era, you have to go back to horse and buggy days to find someone to rival his incompetent baffonery
 

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Are you sure you're from Texas?


Born and raised :) Contrary to popular belief all Texans aren't backwoods rural hicks or neocon's. Many of us here are citified college edumacated libruls.

As a mater of fact if socks and shoes and a mouth full of teeth were required to vote, I'm pretty sure this would be a blue state :) Or if our districts weren't gerrymandered to the point where a 500 vote rural district = 50,000 vote big city district we would return to our democratic roots.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
Born and raised :) Contrary to popular belief all Texans aren't backwoods rural hicks or neocon's. Many of us here are citified college edumacated libruls.

As a mater of fact if socks and shoes and a mouth full of teeth were required to vote, I'm pretty sure this would be a blue state :) Or if our districts weren't gerrymandered to the point where a 500 vote rural district = 50,000 vote big city district we would return to our democratic roots.

You missed it completely :D you said:
you have to go back to horse and buggy days to find someone to rival his incompetent baffonery

He asked if you were from Texas...

Think of who was the last President...:sneaky:
 
Last edited:

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
You missed it completely :D you said:


He asked if you were from Texas...

Think of who was the last President...:sneaky:


Your right, I forgot Red is a huge fan of GWB:awe:

As much as I loathed GWB he wasn't as bad as RR, GWB only continued the idiodic policies started by Ronnie and GW's Daddy.
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
For that matter, simply having sex with someone in his chain of command is a crime.

It is? How? Where?

For some reason lefties seem to have great problems distinguishing between things they very much dislike and things that are criminal.

Pot, meet kettle?
 
Last edited:

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
I guess there is a little glimmer of hope for the country yet. According to the gallup poll Reagan was the best president ever.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/146183/Americans-Say-Reagan-Greatest-President.aspx

WTF is up with idiots putting Obummer and W on that list??? Those two should get a fine for being anywhere even remotely close to that list.

Obviously there's a recency effect, with 4 of the top 10 being recent (1980 to present) presidents, but Obummer and W... best presidents ever!? By what conceivable measure could you put either one of them in that category?

My top 5 list:

  1. Lincoln
  2. Washington
  3. Roosevelt (Teddy, not FD)
  4. Reagan
  5. Thomas Jefferson

I would not put jefferson in the list of the "best" presidents. he was an excellent statesman, but any president that enacts an embargo against our main trading partners is just being dumb. that action had a significantly detrimental effect on our fledgling economy.

I don't know about the other early presidents.

my list of top presidents will include:

Teddy Roosevelt
Nixon
Reagan
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
I guess there is a little glimmer of hope for the country yet. According to the gallup poll Reagan was the best president ever.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/146183/Americans-Say-Reagan-Greatest-President.aspx

WTF is up with idiots putting Obummer and W on that list??? Those two should get a fine for being anywhere even remotely close to that list.

It's possible that the people putting Bush, Obama, and Reagan on the list simply don't know the names of other presidents. This just confirms that we are slowly becoming a Nation of Morons.

No wonder the rich are getting richer while everyone else is getting poorer and our nation's economy is in the dumps.
 

matt0611

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2010
1,879
0
0
My top 5:

1. Grover Cleveland
2. Jefferson
3. Washington
4. Calvin Coolidge
5. Warren G. Harding

Reagan is somewhere in the middle of my ranking.

Bottom 5:

1. GWB
2. Truman
3. Johnson
4. FDR
5. (worst) Wilson

Obama's not ranked yet, so far he will probably be in my bottom 5 though.
 
Last edited: