Galaxy S5 screen apparently really great

ChronoReverse

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2004
2,562
31
91
The screens were capable of it already, the problem was Samsung actually having them calibrated out of the box.

I like the extra brightness and efficiency though.
 

lothar

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2000
6,674
7
76
Galaxy S5 Conclusions: An Impressive Display…
The primary goal of this Display Technology Shoot-Out article series has always been to point out which manufactures and display technologies are leading and advancing the state-of-the-art of displays by performing comprehensive and objective Lab tests and measurements together with in-depth analysis. We point out who is leading, who is behind, who is improving, and sometimes (unfortunately) who is back pedaling… all based solely on the extensive objective measurements that we also publish, so that everyone can judge the data for themselves as well…

OLED Evolution: What is especially significant and impressive is that Samsung has been systematically and significantly improving their OLED display performance with every single Galaxy generation since 2010, when we started tracking OLEDs, summarized in our Galaxy S I,II,III OLED Display, Galaxy S4 OLED Display, and Galaxy Note 3 OLED Display Technology Shoot-Out article series. The Galaxy S5 continues the rapid and impressive improvement in OLED displays and technology. The first notable OLED Smartphone, the Google Nexus One, came in decidedly last place in our 2010 Smartphone Display Shoot-Out. In a span of just four years OLED display technology is now challenging and even exceeding the performance of the best LCDs across the board in brightness, contrast, color accuracy, color management, picture quality, performance in high ambient light, screen uniformity, and viewing angles.

Newest Performance Improvements: The Galaxy S5 has the newest generation of Samsung OLED displays since the Galaxy Note 3 Smartphone, which launched in October 2013, and the Galaxy S4 Smartphone, which launched in April 2013. While many people have assumed that the Galaxy S5 has basically the same display as the Galaxy S4, but just a bit bigger, that isn’t the case… Our detailed Lab tests show that the Galaxy S5 display is a major improvement over the Galaxy S4 and a significant improvement over the Galaxy Note 3 in almost every single test and measurement category – a good reason to consider upgrading.

Best Smartphone Display: Based on our extensive Lab tests and measurements, the Galaxy S5 is the Best performing Smartphone display that we have ever tested. It has a long list of new records for best Smartphone display performance including: Highest Brightness, Lowest Reflectance, Highest Color Accuracy, Infinite Contrast Ratio, Highest Contrast Rating in Ambient Light, and smallest Brightness Variation with Viewing Angle. The Galaxy S5 has raised the bar for top display performance up by another notch – an impressive achievement for OLED technology!

Most Accurate Colors: The Galaxy S5 Cinema Mode has the most accurate colors for any Smartphone or Tablet display that we have ever measured. This is especially important when viewing photos from family and friends (because you often know exactly what they actually should look like), for some TV shows, movies, and sporting events with image content and colors that you are familiar with, and also for viewing online merchandise, so you have a good idea of exactly what colors you’re buying and are less likely to return them.

Beautiful Picture Quality: The Galaxy S5 Cinema Mode provides very nice, pleasing and accurate colors, and picture quality. Although the Image Contrast and Color Saturation are slightly too high (due to a slightly too steep Intensity Scale), the very challenging set of DisplayMate Test and Calibration Photos that we use to evaluate Picture Quality looked Beautiful, even to my experienced hyper-critical eyes. The Cinema Mode is recommended for indoor and low ambient light viewing of most standard consumer content for digital camera, HDTV, internet, and computer content, including photos, videos, and movies. The Adapt Display Mode has significantly more vibrant and saturated colors. Some people like that. It is also particularly recommended for medium and high levels of ambient light viewing because it offsets some of the reflected glare that washes out the images.

Power Efficiency: OLEDs need to continue improving their power efficiency, which is critically important for mobile displays. We measured an impressive 27 percent improvement in display power efficiency between the Galaxy S5 and S4. According to Samsung, this increase is due to more efficient OLED materials and also to improvements in the display electronics and optics. While LCDs remain more power efficient for images with mostly white content (like text screens, for example), OLEDs are now more power efficient for most other content, which are typically darker, because they are emissive displays rather than transmissive like LCDs. In fact, the Galaxy S5 is 27 percent more power efficient than the Full HD LCD Smartphones we recently tested for mixed image content (that includes photos, videos, and movies, for example) with a typical 50 percent Average Picture Level, APL. If this keeps up then OLEDs may pull ahead of LCDs in total power efficiency in the near future…

http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_S5_ShootOut_1.htm
Cue in the AMOLED haters.
 

tvdang7

Platinum Member
Jun 4, 2005
2,242
5
81
We will see in the AT batterylife test since the s3-s4 wasn't all that great with battery life. I do like the htc one battery life results so mixed with this efficient display and the snapdragon 801 it should do well.
 

hans030390

Diamond Member
Feb 3, 2005
7,326
2
76
Is it still PenTile-based? Even with the latest Galaxy models (haven't tried S5), I've still been able to tell they're running PenTile displays despite the DPI being high enough that the human eye shouldn't be able to see individual pixels. PenTile still imparts a certain quality to the display that is still noticeable at high DPI, though it's not nearly as bad as it was on early models. Every other aspect of the screens tends to be fine, but I can always pick out PenTile displays. Can't stand it.
 

Rdmkr

Senior member
Aug 2, 2013
272
0
0
Sony XPeria Z2 has a very impressive display too with a color range exceeding that of typical Amoled and a full RGB stripe subpixel pattern. Sounds like a true battle of titans between these two. My money is on the Z2 for overall experience, but I also don't expect either to be worth upgrading to from a last generation model.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
For the record, I have nothing against OLEDs. I've seen SONY's $24K OLED monitors and those things are out of this world. I also have nothing against Samsung since I have their tablet. What I do not like is craptastic wares being peddled as exceptional. I have yet to make a judgement on the latest Samsung OLEDs but I can see why owners of previous Samsung OLED products would be excited about this new one. When you're starting from the gutter anything is better, The question is, can it match the high quality IPS displays from JDI, LG, or Sharp?
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
The question is, can it match the high quality IPS displays from JDI, LG, or Sharp?
It does, but that's besides the point. LCDs are on their way out. When economies of scale bring OLED prices way down (particularly for larger sizes), LCD is dead tech, except in $40 off-brand tablets.

No 1st-tier smartphone maker will be using LCDs in 5 years. They can continue making LCDs thinner and thinner, but they will never be as thin as OLEDs.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2006
11,036
11
91
People have been saying great things about Samsung OLEDs since their inceptions. My eyes have seen something completely different. Hence, I don't need someone else telling what is and isn't great. I can do that for myself.
And you think this is less to do with the actual display and more to do with your own built in biases?

Because I think I'll take objective tests based on reality over a pair of subjective human eyes.
 

dawheat

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
3,132
93
91
People have been saying great things about Samsung OLEDs since their inceptions. My eyes have seen something completely different. Hence, I don't need someone else telling what is and isn't great. I can do that for myself.

I believe people have said they've liked Samsung AMOLEDs since their beginning, mostly due to their contrast and saturation levels. No objective review, including Displaymate, have given top marks to an AMOLED screen until the S4/Note 3 which lines up with my personal experience. The S4/Note 3 generation of screens that got their brightness and white levels to a point where they weren't substantially deficient compared to the top LCD screens, with the Note 3 being better than the S4.

My Note 3 is worlds more legible in the bright sun than my previous Note 2 - though I still find Lux Dash better at controlling auto-brightness than the stock control.

The review also lines up with my short hands-on with the S5 when compared side by side to my Note 3 and wife's iPhone 5. The whites are quite good (didn't give up anything to the iPhone) and it was brighter than the Note 3 screen.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
It does, but that's besides the point. LCDs are on their way out. When economies of scale bring OLED prices way down (particularly for larger sizes), LCD is dead tech, except in $40 off-brand tablets.

No 1st-tier smartphone maker will be using LCDs in 5 years. They can continue making LCDs thinner and thinner, but they will never be as thin as OLEDs.

Maybe, maybe not. What I do know is that the OLEDs from Samsung have been terrible in the past. And that was when people were saying they were great. So, excuse me if I doubt that the latest and greatest from Samsung is seen as great.

And you think this is less to do with the actual display and more to do with your own built in biases?

Because I think I'll take objective tests based on reality over a pair of subjective human eyes.

All day every day, girlfriend. I trust my eyes far more than what someone on some website tells me. Samsung's OLEDs have been craptistic but people were lauding them as if they were the perfect screens. I've learned to be distrustful every since.

I believe people have said they've liked Samsung AMOLEDs since their beginning, mostly due to their contrast and saturation levels. No objective review, including Displaymate, have given top marks to an AMOLED screen until the S4/Note 3 which lines up with my personal experience. The S4/Note 3 generation of screens that got their brightness and white levels to a point where they weren't substantially deficient compared to the top LCD screens, with the Note 3 being better than the S4.

My Note 3 is worlds more legible in the bright sun than my previous Note 2 - though I still find Lux Dash better at controlling auto-brightness than the stock control.

The review also lines up with my short hands-on with the S5 when compared side by side to my Note 3 and wife's iPhone 5. The whites are quite good (didn't give up anything to the iPhone) and it was brighter than the Note 3 screen.

We all know that OLEDs have inherent advantages. And the tests bare those out. What I (and others) have issues with is how Samsung bastardizes their own OLED screens, adding different tints depending on the mood of the Samsung technicians that day. I've had OLED on smartphones from various phone manufacturers and they look excellent compared to the crap that was on the Galaxy phones.
 

RollWave

Diamond Member
May 20, 2003
4,201
3
81
I'm considering jumping ship from my iPhone 5 to this thing. We shall see. Battery life will be what is most important for my use.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
I'm considering jumping ship from my iPhone 5 to this thing. We shall see. Battery life will be what is most important for my use.

I saw one review show it matching the G2, which is very impressive. Best to compare various reviews though.