Ok so I "upgraded" to a G9x as I figured 2500 more DPI would mean I could lower my sensitivity and have more accurate tracking. Supposedly this is the only difference between the 2 mice. Other than the angle snapping option in SetPoint it does initially appear that way.
I have found the G9x to be less precise than my G9. I played with both for about 30 mins in mspaint, both on the exact same DPI, sensitivity, surface, and polling rate. Consistently I was able to draw much straighter lines with the G9 than the G9x at the same settings. I tried several DPI settings, sensitivity, and polling rate settings on the G9x and could not match the precision of the G9.
To me this upgrade to their laser is a gimmick. Yes it moved a tiny bit faster at a lower sensitivity setting but it moved less accurately. It may be 2500 more DPI but however they accomplished that almost feels "faked"
If you are considering getting one of these, go with the G9.
I have found the G9x to be less precise than my G9. I played with both for about 30 mins in mspaint, both on the exact same DPI, sensitivity, surface, and polling rate. Consistently I was able to draw much straighter lines with the G9 than the G9x at the same settings. I tried several DPI settings, sensitivity, and polling rate settings on the G9x and could not match the precision of the G9.
To me this upgrade to their laser is a gimmick. Yes it moved a tiny bit faster at a lower sensitivity setting but it moved less accurately. It may be 2500 more DPI but however they accomplished that almost feels "faked"
If you are considering getting one of these, go with the G9.