• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

G80 renders Playboy's Cover, Adrianne Curry

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So, does this mean I'll have to upgrade from my Geforce 7950 GX2 ?!? :disgust:

Staying top of the line costs too much money 🙁
 
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: schneiderguy
they could make millions if they made it render jessica alba :Q:Q:Q:Q:Q:Q:Q:Q
Click to expand...

You would need a physics card for when she does jumping jacks.
Click to expand...

no, just a little work with Sway, Flex, & Strength inside 3D Max.

for rendering in real time ? that would take some computation.

not THAT's a reason to buy a Core 2 Duo !
 
my hat's off to nvidia's marketing

they ARE brilliant

i AM impressed that it is Ms Curry . . . the Playboy Cover model for this February
:heart:

so now i think the G80 will be crap.

😉



😀

r600 had better be twins 😛
:Q
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
i am impressed and then i am not:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/adrireznor2/KELSUN.jpg

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/adrireznor2/Adri3D-1.jpg

these are "safe'"
[the hair looks great in one pic; the face looks 'rendered' in another]

. . . and here is her blog on MySpace
[i have not read it all to see if it is 'safe' but evidently the pics are real rendered by g80]:

NeXt, Modeling, tv, and Nvidia
Click to expand...

Oh cmon this is obviously fake... The first one is so obvious.. The hair is totally off... BAD photoshop work, I could do that in 2 minutes...

The second one is way too bland.. even Ruby has more detail... :thumbsdown:
 
Originally posted by: ShadowOfMyself
Originally posted by: apoppin
i am impressed and then i am not:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/adrireznor2/KELSUN.jpg

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/adrireznor2/Adri3D-1.jpg

these are "safe'"
[the hair looks great in one pic; the face looks 'rendered' in another]

. . . and here is her blog on MySpace
[i have not read it all to see if it is 'safe' but evidently the pics are real rendered by g80]:

NeXt, Modeling, tv, and Nvidia
Click to expand...

Oh cmon this is obviously fake... The first one is so obvious.. The hair is totally off... BAD photoshop work, I could do that in 2 minutes...

The second one is way too bland.. even Ruby has more detail... :thumbsdown:
Click to expand...

i certainly hope you are right

i originally thought it was fake . . . but it is Miss February and the pics are on her blog. 😛
Wednesday, September 20, 2006


Virtual Me

had to show everyone this. I have become not only "the face" but an animated virtual version of myself! A company called Nvidia has just hadf a break through with virtual people. I get to show the world come October what that is. I would love to explain, but all the people that put hours of hard work into this deserve the spotlot. When they do bring it out, there will be a walking/talking/dancing virtual me! It was fun to do it. I had to go get taped by over 700 camera's. They put small reflective dots all over my face, neck, and body. I had to move, catwalk, talk, ect. This is all top of the line stuff. I have some stills from the Nvidia boys (who f@*$ing ROCK by the way) enjoy!
Click to expand...
 
That doesn't look that great at all. Also what's with all the ugly sepia artifacts? Crysis would easily beat that, and in real time too. :/ Well maybe not Crysis, but CGSociety has much better material.
 
Originally posted by: xtknight
That doesn't look that great at all. Also what's with all the ugly sepia artifacts? Crysis would easily beat that, and in real time too. :/ Well maybe not Crysis, but CGSociety has much better material.
Click to expand...

i'm pretty sure it is real 😛

rendered people aren't quite ready for primetime - in still shots
--'motion' may be quite different 😉

wait for Nov 8th

i have lowered my expectations for g80 by one notch :brokenheart:
 
Originally posted by: Frackal
Well I hope that modeling looks better than those pics, I dont even know what to say about those 2 pictures
Click to expand...

there are some 'nice' things you can say 😛

the 'hair' in the first one is rather detailed

finally, it is a 'still'

in motion may be very different and quite realistic - perhaps compared with 'Final Fantasy Spirits Within' which was done by a render farm.

and [really finally] i always thought Adrianne Curry had that 'barbie doll' plastic look anyway 😛

they airbrush her playboy photos
:Q
 
Yikes! A newb photoshop job and and bald model with painted on hair. No wonder Nvidia has IQ problems... they're stone BLIND!
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
i am impressed and then i am not:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/adrireznor2/KELSUN.jpg

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/adrireznor2/Adri3D-1.jpg

these are "safe'"
[the hair looks great in one pic; the face looks 'rendered' in another]

. . . and here is her blog on MySpace
[i have not read it all to see if it is 'safe' but evidently the pics are real rendered by g80]:

NeXt, Modeling, tv, and Nvidia
Click to expand...

im guessing it'll look better in motion when the hair and stuff is moving.
 
Originally posted by: BFG10K
The way it's meant to be played...[with]
Click to expand...

what . ..

silicone?plastic?airbrushing?photochopping?boobs?rendering?
😕

and it undoubtedly does look better 'in motion'
😉

yes, the rendered pics were evidently done by G80
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top