N NoobyDoo Senior member Nov 13, 2006 463 0 71 Feb 4, 2013 #1 IB G1610 is $49 while G2120 is $99. Would a average/typical user ( non-gamer, non-development, email/browsing/chat/music/video ) notice a difference between the two ? Any reviews of G161x G20xx ?
IB G1610 is $49 while G2120 is $99. Would a average/typical user ( non-gamer, non-development, email/browsing/chat/music/video ) notice a difference between the two ? Any reviews of G161x G20xx ?
AtenRa Lifer Feb 2, 2009 14,003 3,362 136 Feb 4, 2013 #2 Nope, they will not notice any difference. Add the savings for an SSD
sm625 Diamond Member May 6, 2011 8,172 137 106 Feb 5, 2013 #3 Intel would be greedy enough to charge 100% more for 1MB of cache and 20% more clock speed. According to passmark and some minor curve fitting, a G1610 is just as fast as a ~4GHz core 2 E8600. Last edited: Feb 5, 2013
Intel would be greedy enough to charge 100% more for 1MB of cache and 20% more clock speed. According to passmark and some minor curve fitting, a G1610 is just as fast as a ~4GHz core 2 E8600.
Jimzz Diamond Member Oct 23, 2012 4,399 190 106 Feb 5, 2013 #4 Both are Ivy based and have the same GPU. So with no gaming I would say no real noticable differance. A SSD and the G1610 CPU would be a much better round system IMO.
Both are Ivy based and have the same GPU. So with no gaming I would say no real noticable differance. A SSD and the G1610 CPU would be a much better round system IMO.
DominionSeraph Diamond Member Jul 22, 2009 8,386 32 91 Feb 6, 2013 #6 G2120 is $78 at Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0093H8K1C/?tag=pcpapi-20