OS
Lifer
I am using these in my rig now,
i originally had corsair 1600/CL9 but my system struggled to run them at the highest rated speed, no matter how high i cranked the voltage.
I know that is considered an overclocked speed for the cpu/mobo, but particularly my unlocked core, i suspect the memory controller was weak, it was always the first to crap out in P95 testing with the corsair at 1600.
anyways, i have ECOs now and they will run 1600/CL9 for an hour or two no probs so far and trying 1600/CL7 right now
this test not exhaustive, but even thus far they are working better than the corsairs i was using, even despite my suspected weak core.
ed; CL7/1600 made the BIOS crap out and on gskills forum there is a blurb about how AMD boards do not support CL7 very well, trying CL8 instead..
i originally had corsair 1600/CL9 but my system struggled to run them at the highest rated speed, no matter how high i cranked the voltage.
I know that is considered an overclocked speed for the cpu/mobo, but particularly my unlocked core, i suspect the memory controller was weak, it was always the first to crap out in P95 testing with the corsair at 1600.
anyways, i have ECOs now and they will run 1600/CL9 for an hour or two no probs so far and trying 1600/CL7 right now
this test not exhaustive, but even thus far they are working better than the corsairs i was using, even despite my suspected weak core.
ed; CL7/1600 made the BIOS crap out and on gskills forum there is a blurb about how AMD boards do not support CL7 very well, trying CL8 instead..
Last edited: