The Verdict
It's impressive to see what today's cards are capable of when decoding, accelerating and enhancing HD content. Apparently our test-system in combo with PowerDVD does not have a problem accelerating HD content at all. Even if you wouldn't use the graphics card as accelerator. A PC with a Core 2 Duo E6600 for example would achieve a CPU load of roughly 30-40% during that decoding process. When we peek at VC-1 decoding there's definitely some gain with NVIDIA's PureVideo HD compatible products yet the Radeon Avivo HD in combo with a HD 2600 XT card was showing extremely impressive results. ATI is definitely the winner in this segment.
When we take a deeper look at h.264 decoding then literally ... there's no way I can describe you how well both 2400, 2600 and 8600 cards can cope with it. At certain intervals during the decoding stage we noticed a CPU load stage of 0% while it was decoding and displaying Pan's Labyrinth at 1920x1080i at a dope 20-25 Mbit/sec bitstream. Truly amazing, as when you disable GPU acceleration our CPU (C2D 6800- 2.9 GHz Dual Core) would show an average of 40% CPU utilization with peaks towards 50%. Amazing stuff, both AMD-ATI and NVIDIA have done a great job here.
We then move onwards to image quality. Now it's save to say that both mid-range competitors have excellent VPU's (video processing unit) in their new mid-range products. ATI kicked butt; NVIDIA's results however disappointed big-time. With the current drivers it's not post-processing the content as the way it's meant to be played back. We hardly spot noise reduction, and the film-tests where simply disappointing from a quality perspective, moiré effects everything was just not looking good.