fx 9590 1.912V stock? Is this a mistake?

[Mtt]

According to http://www.techpowerup.com/cpudb/1650/fx-9590.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_FX_microprocessors the cpu runs at 1.92V.

Is it real? I thought its 1.5V.

 

[inf64]

It's a mistake. 1.9V is "safe" only on LN2 and only for short periods of time.

 

[FalseChristian]

That can't be right. I'm running my i5 2500K (3.3GHz) heavily overclocked to 4.5GHz using only 1.34v full-load. I think you're excellent CPU runs less than 1.5v at stock? The overclock of 8.2GHz on that same CPU was achieved using 1.925v I believe.

 

[Smoblikat]

More than likely meant 1.512v, and thats at MOST.